Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Covert US support for Iranian operations in Iraq to become overt
Hotair ^ | 03/25/2015 | Noah Rothman

Posted on 03/25/2015 1:58:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

For a time, both American and Iraqi officials denied reports that indicated Iranian military forces were operating openly in Iraq and aiding in that country’s fight against the Islamic State. When the signs of Iranian military operations in Iraq became overwhelming and undeniable, both Iraqi and American officials acknowledged Iranian military involvement in Iraq. American commanders and administration officials stressed, however, that there was no cooperation with Iranian military commanders. In fact, administration sources insisted that the United States routinely went out of its way to avoid the appearance of collusion with Iranian operatives on the ground in Iraq. Still, enterprising journalists revealed on several occasions that American involvement in the fight against ISIS had resulted in aiding Iranian military operations, albeit possibly inadvertently. That covert support for offensive operations in Iraq led by Iran is apparently about to become overt.

The operation to retake the Iraqi city of Tikrit from ISIS, led by Iran and Iraqi Security Forces and aided by Shiite militias loyal to Tehran, has stalled. On Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal revealed that American aerial intelligence units had begun to provide Iraqi forces and Iran-backed militias with support.

“Military officials said they aren’t working directly with Iran,” the report read. “But the intelligence will be used to help some 20,000 Iranian-backed Shiite militia fighters who make up the bulk of the force that has been struggling for weeks to retake the strategic city.”

The Pentagon said Tuesday that the campaign had stalled amid tough fighting by hundreds of Islamic State fighters still holding most of Tikrit. At the request of the Iraqi government, the U.S. military began providing aerial video of the city, said an official with the American-led coalition helping Iraq fight Islamic State.

The U.S. involvement could pave the way for American airstrikes in Tikrit, hometown of onetime dictator Saddam Hussein.

The way having been thoroughly paved, apparently, The Daily Beast discovered on Wednesday that American air support for Iranian-backed combat operations on the ground was imminent.

An American air strike campaign in Tikrit would mark an important shift in the ISIS war. Iraqi officials did not engage their American counterparts before they launched the offensive on Tikrit March 1, with Iranian generals and tanks by their side. And the American military has long insisted that it wouldn’t coordinate too closely with the Iranians, even as both forces fight a common enemy in Iraq: ISIS.

The Tikrit campaign was launched with a patchwork force of 20,000 Shiite militiamen, 3,000 Iraqi troops, and a bevy of Iranian troops, tanks, weapons and missile strikes. And in the early days of the campaign, Gen. Qassem Suleiman, leader of the Iranian Quds force, was on the ground in Tikrit.

U.S. officials told The Daily Beast that the heaviest resistance to expanding the American involvement to air strikes will not be from the Obama administration—which has long shrugged off the idea of cooperating militarily with Iran—but from some Shiite militia leaders who have said they can reclaim the city without American help.

“The Shiite militia leaders have been saying we don’t need American air strikes so they have been pushing back on this idea. So there is going to be an internally debate within the Iraqi state,” the adviser said.

Shortly after this report was published, the airstrikes in support of ground forces reportedly began.

WASHINGTON (AP) — US airstrikes underway in stalled Iraqi battle to retake Tikrit from Islamic State group.

— Dion Nissenbaum (@DionNissenbaum) March 25, 2015

As The Daily Beast report indicates, Iranian military cooperation with the United States is as vexing a political problem for officials in Tehran as it is in Washington. If prestige is on the line, that’s one thing, but there may also be some American tactical considerations that defense officials believe could be advanced by conducting airstrikes in support of Iranian-led anti-ISIS missions.

“If this leads to the Iranians forced to concede defeat, that would be a satisfactory outcome,” said an unnamed defense official in The Daily Beast’s report.

Huh? That’s a strange statement. Precisely how would aiding the success of an Iranian-backed advance into Tikrit resulting in that city’s fall to Iraqi and Shiite forces precipitate Iranian contrition? It’s rare that major tactical victories produce an overwhelming sense of regret in the victor.

That quote sounds like a bit of wishful thinking on the part of this unnamed defense official, and perhaps it helps for those coming to terms with American-Iranian battlefield cooperation in Iraq. But that cooperation is coming, and it is forcing America’s traditional Sunni allies in Cairo and Riyadh to rethink their approaches to domestic and regional security. Whether or not some think America’s shifting alliances in the region are necessary, this change in U.S. grand strategy is self-evidently destabilizing.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; isis; kurdistan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2015 1:58:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We started helping Iran in Iraq back in 2003, when we toppled their biggest enemy in the world — Saddam. Everything since then is small potatoes.


2 posted on 03/25/2015 2:00:34 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“I’ll go down in history as the Black Kissinger...!”


3 posted on 03/25/2015 2:02:42 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

“I’ll go down in history as the Black Kissinger...!”

No, he’ll go down as another George Bush, because he’s following Bush’s lead in helping Iran in Iraq.


4 posted on 03/25/2015 2:04:28 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I don’t think we’ll hear another Democrat complain about Reagan’s “Arms For Hostages” deal now.


5 posted on 03/25/2015 2:07:15 PM PDT by Citizen Zed ("Freedom costs a buck o five" - Gary Johnston, TAWP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Instead, US efforts should be concentrated on a free and independent Kurdistan.

6 posted on 03/25/2015 2:15:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Bush got CONNED into overthrowing Saddam. CONNED by the NWO U.N. cabal who now hold Barry's puppet strings. This has been going on for a LONG time only now Barry is going OVERT about UNDOING all of America's influence throughout the Middle East.. Overthrow of Ghadaffi, Mubarak, Yemen gov't, blah blah blah..

Has anyone asked their OTHER puppet Hillary WHY SHE SUPPORTED THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN EGYPT YET?

7 posted on 03/25/2015 2:29:53 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Barry is helping Iran throughout the Middle East. Perhaps he is an Iranian agent or did ValJar recruit him as her agent for Iran?


8 posted on 03/25/2015 2:31:57 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Valarie Jarrett must be soooooo pleased.


9 posted on 03/25/2015 2:37:29 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

helping the Iranian IslamoNazis, who just this week AGAIN threatened to destroy America, take over additional countries is hardly consistent with American values.
But then again, neither is the Occupancy in our WH.


10 posted on 03/25/2015 3:00:56 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (Foolish people ... have eyes and see not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Bush got CONNED into overthrowing Saddam.

Your point? You’re saying that excuses him?


11 posted on 03/25/2015 3:24:58 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

SWEET MOTHER OF HADES – It’s Official – U.S. Air Force Working With Iranian Army – U.S. Conducting Air Strikes Over Tikrit…

Posted on March 25, 2015 by sundance

No details yet, but this essentially destroys the Obama claim the U.S. was not working with Iranian army.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/03/25/sweet-mother-of-hades-its-official-u-s-air-force-working-with-iranian-army-u-s-conducting-air-strikes-over-tikrit/


12 posted on 03/25/2015 3:26:55 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Bush might as well have been an Iranian agent - he toppled their biggest enemy (Saddam) and presided over the establishment of a Shia government in Iraq, run by folks who’d been living in Iran during the Saddam years.


13 posted on 03/25/2015 3:27:10 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
From the State Department's page on State Sponsors of Terrorism:
Country Designation Date
Cuba March 1, 1982
Iran January 19, 1984
Sudan August 12, 1993
Syria December 29, 1979
From The US Code:
22 U.S. Code § 2780 - Transactions with countries supporting acts of international terrorism
(a) Prohibited transactions by United States Government
The following transactions by the United States Government are prohibited:
 (1) Exporting or otherwise providing (by sale, lease or loan, grant, or other means), directly or indirectly, any munitions item to a country described in subsection (d) of this section under the authority of this chapter, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.], or any other law (except as provided in subsection (h) of this section). In implementing this paragraph, the United States Government—
   (A) shall suspend delivery to such country of any such item pursuant to any such transaction which has not been completed at the time the Secretary of State makes the determination described in subsection (d) of this section, and
   (B) shall terminate any lease or loan to such country of any such item which is in effect at the time the Secretary of State makes that determination.
 (2) Providing credits, guarantees, or other financial assistance under the authority of this chapter, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.], or any other law (except as provided in subsection (h) of this section), with respect to the acquisition of any munitions item by a country described in subsection (d) of this section. In implementing this paragraph, the United States Government shall suspend expenditures pursuant to any such assistance obligated before the Secretary of State makes the determination described in subsection (d) of this section. The President may authorize expenditures otherwise required to be suspended pursuant to the preceding sentence if the President has determined, and reported to the Congress, that suspension of those expenditures causes undue financial hardship to a supplier, shipper, or similar person and allowing the expenditure will not result in any munitions item being made available for use by such country.
 (3) Consenting under section 2753 (a) of this title, under section 505(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2314 (a)], under the regulations issued to carry out section 2778 of this title, or under any other law (except as provided in subsection (h) of this section), to any transfer of any munitions item to a country described in subsection (d) of this section. In implementing this paragraph, the United States Government shall withdraw any such consent which is in effect at the time the Secretary of State makes the determination described in subsection (d) of this section, except that this sentence does not apply with respect to any item that has already been transferred to such country.
 (4) Providing any license or other approval under section 2778 of this title for any export or other transfer (including by means of a technical assistance agreement, manufacturing licensing agreement, or coproduction agreement) of any munitions item to a country described in subsection (d) of this section. In implementing this paragraph, the United States Government shall suspend any such license or other approval which is in effect at the time the Secretary of State makes the determination described in subsection (d) of this section, except that this sentence does not apply with respect to any item that has already been exported or otherwise transferred to such country.
 (5) Otherwise facilitating the acquisition of any munitions item by a country described in subsection (d) of this section. This paragraph applies with respect to activities undertaken—
   (A) by any department, agency, or other instrumentality of the Government,
   (B) by any officer or employee of the Government (including members of the United States Armed Forces), or
   (C) by any other person at the request or on behalf of the Government.
   The Secretary of State may waive the requirements of the second sentence of paragraph (1), the second sentence of paragraph (3), and the second sentence of paragraph (4) to the extent that the Secretary determines, after consultation with the Congress, that unusual and compelling circumstances require that the United States Government not take the actions specified in that sentence.
(b) Prohibited transactions by United States persons
 (1) In general
A United States person may not take any of the following actions:
   (A) Exporting any munitions item to any country described in subsection (d) of this section.
   (B) Selling, leasing, loaning, granting, or otherwise providing any munitions item to any country described in subsection (d) of this section.
   (C) Selling, leasing, loaning, granting, or otherwise providing any munitions item to any recipient which is not the government of or a person in a country described in subsection (d) of this section if the United States person has reason to know that the munitions item will be made available to any country described in subsection (d) of this section.
   (D) Taking any other action which would facilitate the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of any munitions item by the government of any country described in subsection (d) of this section, or any person acting on behalf of that government, if the United States person has reason to know that that action will facilitate the acquisition of that item by such a government or person.
 (2) Liability for actions of foreign subsidiaries, etc.
A United States person violates this subsection if a corporation or other person that is controlled in fact by that United States person (as determined under regulations, which the President shall issue) takes an action described in paragraph (1) outside the United States.
 (3) Applicability to actions outside the United States
Paragraph (1) applies with respect to actions described in that paragraph which are taken either within or outside the United States by a United States person described in subsection (l)(3)(A) or (B) of this section. To the extent provided in regulations issued under subsection (l)(3)(D) of this section, paragraph (1) applies with respect to actions described in that paragraph which are taken outside the United States by a person designated as a United States person in those regulations.
(c) Transfers to governments and persons covered
This section applies with respect to—
 (1) the acquisition of munitions items by the government of a country described in subsection (d) of this section; and
 (2) the acquisition of munitions items by any individual, group, or other person within a country described in subsection (d) of this section, except to the extent that subparagraph (D) of subsection (b)(1) of this section provides otherwise.
(d) Countries covered by prohibition
The prohibitions contained in this section apply with respect to a country if the Secretary of State determines that the government of that country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism. For purposes of this subsection, such acts shall include all activities that the Secretary determines willfully aid or abet the international proliferation of nuclear explosive devices to individuals or groups, willfully aid or abet an individual or groups in acquiring unsafeguarded special nuclear material, or willfully aid or abet the efforts of an individual or group to use, develop, produce, stockpile, or otherwise acquire chemical, biological, or radiological weapons.
(e) Publication of determinations
Each determination of the Secretary of State under subsection (d) of this section shall be published in the Federal Register.
(f) Rescission
 (1) A determination made by the Secretary of State under subsection (d) of this section may not be rescinded unless the President submits to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate—
   (A) before the proposed rescission would take effect, a report certifying that—
     (i) there has been a fundamental change in the leadership and policies of the government of the country concerned;
     (ii) that government is not supporting acts of international terrorism; and
     (iii) that government has provided assurances that it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future; or
   (B) at least 45 days before the proposed rescission would take effect, a report justifying the rescission and certifying that—
     (i) the government concerned has not provided any support for international terrorism during the preceding 6-month period; and
     (ii) the government concerned has provided assurances that it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future.
 (2)
   (A) No rescission under paragraph (1)(B) of a determination under subsection (d) of this section may be made if the Congress, within 45 days after receipt of a report under paragraph (1)(B), enacts a joint resolution the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That the proposed rescission of the determination under section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act pursuant to the report submitted to the Congress on XXXXXXXXX is hereby prohibited.”, the blank to be completed with the appropriate date.
   (B) A joint resolution described in subparagraph (A) and introduced within the appropriate 45-day period shall be considered in the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with paragraphs (3) through (7) of section 8066(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (as contained in Public Law 98–473), except that references in such paragraphs to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate shall be deemed to be references to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, respectively.
(g) Waiver
The President may waive the prohibitions contained in this section with respect to a specific transaction if—
 (1) the President determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States; and
 (2) not less than 15 days prior to the proposed transaction, the President—
   (A) consults with the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
   (B) submits to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report containing—
     (i) the name of any country involved in the proposed transaction, the identity of any recipient of the items to be provided pursuant to the proposed transaction, and the anticipated use of those items;
     (ii) a description of the munitions items involved in the proposed transaction (including their market value) and the actual sale price at each step in the transaction (or if the items are transferred by other than sale, the manner in which they will be provided);
     (iii) the reasons why the proposed transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States and the justification for such proposed transaction;
     (iv) the date on which the proposed transaction is expected to occur; and
     (v) the name of every United States Government department, agency, or other entity involved in the proposed transaction, every foreign government involved in the proposed transaction, and every private party with significant participation in the proposed transaction.
To the extent possible, the information specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) shall be provided in unclassified form, with any classified information provided in an addendum to the report.
(h) Exemption for transactions subject to National Security Act reporting requirements
The prohibitions contained in this section do not apply with respect to any transaction subject to reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 ([50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.]; relating to congressional oversight of intelligence activities).
(i) Relation to other laws
 (1) In general
With regard to munitions items controlled pursuant to this chapter, the provisions of this section shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of law, other than section 614(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2364 (a)).
 (2) Section 614(a) waiver authority
If the authority of section 614(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2364 (a)] is used to permit a transaction under that Act [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.] or this chapter which is otherwise prohibited by this section, the written policy justification required by that section shall include the information specified in subsection (g)(2)(B) of this section.
(j) Criminal penalty
Any person who willfully violates this section shall be fined for each violation not more than $1,000,000, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(k) Civil penalties; enforcement
In the enforcement of this section, the President is authorized to exercise the same powers concerning violations and enforcement which are conferred upon departments, agencies, and officials by sections 11(c), 11(e), 11(g), and 12(a) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 [50 App. U.S.C. 2410 (c), (e), (g), 2411 (a)] (subject to the same terms and conditions as are applicable to such powers under that Act [50 App. U.S.C. 2401 et seq.]), except that section 11(c)(2)(B) of such Act shall not apply, and instead, as prescribed in regulations issued under this section, the Secretary of State may assess civil penalties for violations of this chapter and regulations prescribed thereunder and further may commence a civil action to recover such civil penalties, and except further that, notwithstanding section 11(c) of that Act, the civil penalty for each violation of this section may not exceed $500,000.
(l) Definitions
As used in this section—
 (1) the term “munitions item” means any item enumerated on the United States Munitions list [1] (without regard to whether the item is imported into or exported from the United States);
 (2) the term “United States”, when used geographically, means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States;
 (3) the term “United States person” means—
   (A) any citizen or permanent resident alien of the United States;
   (B) any sole proprietorship, partnership, company, association, or corporation having its principal place of business within the United States or organized under the laws of the United States, any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or any territory or possession of the United States;
   (C) any other person with respect to that person’s actions while in the United States; and
   (D) to the extent provided in regulations issued by the Secretary of State, any person that is not described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) but—
     (i) is a foreign subsidiary or affiliate of a United States person described in subparagraph (B) and is controlled in fact by that United States person (as determined in accordance with those regulations), or
     (ii) is otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with respect to that person’s actions while outside the United States;
 (4) the term “nuclear explosive device” has the meaning given that term in section 6305 (4) of this title; and
 (5) the term “unsafeguarded special nuclear material” has the meaning given that term in section 6305 (8) of this title.
So then under (b)(C) you, who has reason to believe this will make munitions available to Iran, are prohibited in financial transactions with the US — so, paying your taxes is prohibited by law, and the law says you must pay taxes.
14 posted on 03/25/2015 3:35:06 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardens Hollow; null and void; laplata; Gluteus Maximus; Salvavida; Foundahardheadedwoman; ...

CWII Spark Ping — “Damned if you do, damned if you don’t” laws make it very hard to respect [or argue the legitimacy of] the government.


15 posted on 03/25/2015 3:37:10 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

666
DAYS
6
HOURS
13
MINUTES Not Soon enough!


16 posted on 03/25/2015 3:39:33 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama is eventually going to have American forces fighting on both sides of a war. They will be shooting at each other, and no matter which side wins, Obama will declare victory in that battle. It is genius in its pure simplicity and duplicity. A no lose scenario. The only war a progressive can love.


17 posted on 03/25/2015 4:09:49 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way. Was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Not exactly. Saddam had launched major ground offenses on the Kurds even with the Clinton no fly zone. Under those circumstances, the Kurds would have eventually been crushed. We would be here right now with no Kurdish forces. GWB protected the Kurds.


18 posted on 03/25/2015 4:14:13 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way. Was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

GWB protected the Kurds.

By destroying Iran’s number one enemy.


19 posted on 03/25/2015 4:15:57 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

You misunderstand: the problem will not be resolved merely by changing the president.


20 posted on 03/25/2015 4:21:35 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson