"I am not pleased."
About time he’s charged with something. I was tired of him being hailed a hero.
Also charged with misbehavior before the enemy.
Will be a courtmartial hearing.
Can some knowledgeable Freeper help me understand what in the world motivated this administration to trade five (as I recall) high ranking enemy for this guy? I cannot figure it out— and I recognize that given this administration’s political orientation, the explanation may not be one that’s good the U.S. But I can’t figure out how it makes sense even from the President’s pro-Islamist, anti-American perspective. Did he just want an excuse to send those five guys back to the battlefield? Why’d he need Bergdahl for that?
Announcement is over.
No questions being taken
Desertion in the face of the enemy used to be a death penalty offense.
Well I hope they find a good firing squad. Maybe friends and family of the soldiers that were killed looking for this muslim sympathizer pos.
Desertion and not defection? What a bunch of BS.
After Obama worked out a deal like this one, trading five senior terrorists for one American deserter, how do you suppose he’s going to do dealing with Iran?
Is the cell formerly occupied by John Walker still available?
This Brooke Baldwin on CNN kept trying to plead his case that his 5 yrs in captivity was punishment enough.
"I am not pleased."