Appeals court sets April hearing on Obama immigration action

LaCrosse Tribune ^ | March 24, 2015 | JUAN A. LOZANO

[pierrem15]

Congress is where?

Welcoming them-- the Dems want new voters, the Pubs want cheap labor.

[Eagles6]

Yep.

[txhurl]

I think it means they’re going to go strict word-by-word constitutionalist on King v Whatserface. No more extending ‘this is what we *think* you were TRYING to say in this law’.

I take it as a wonderful omen. Did you know Cruz declared today he’s signing up he and his family for Zerocare?

[Democrat_media]

Thanks to Hostage, Jane Long and others for this thread and informative posts that we need to know about . the Liberal news media is hiding that the Judge stopped Obama’s illegal amnesty and that there is a court battle on going.

[Revel]

Looks like the 5th circuit is well in the bag of judicial corruption.

[txhurl]

Looks like the 5th circuit is well in the bag of judicial corruption.

---

That’s not the impression we have here, just the opposite. Not to say the Chocolate City’s judges can’t be threatened with life and limb, though. Or, ‘nice little 10th Anniversary of Katrina you got there, shame if something were to happen to it.’

[Jacquerie]

<>Scalia told him the SCOTUS was getting weary of bailing Congress out.<>

<>What does that mean?<>

It has nothing to do with congress “growing a pair.”

It means Scotus was never designed to protect state interests. Only the states themselves can do that. Only through the Framers’ design of the senate can they defeat horrid, anti-10th Amendment congressional bills before they become law. The Framers did not expect federalism to be protected by Scotus, but rather by constitutional structure. It was the interplay between the people and states in congress that was supposed to determine the limits of federal and state powers, not Scotus.

Scotus is institutionally and temperamentally incapable of serving as a substitute for the states in congress.

It is long past time to correct a mistake, the 17th Amendment. Since congress will never voluntarily relinquish power, it is up to us to reestablish freedom saving federalism.

Article V. There is no substitute.

[Liz]

Obama would spare from deportation as many as 5 million people who are in the U.S. illegally......

To best understand what is going on, we need to call this what it is......and invasion of foreigners seeking to over throw the US govt. The ding-a-ling in the WH recognizes no laws---he considers our laws to be a plot by evil white men to suppress "people of pallor."

Here, Obama reveals himself, taking his America hatred to new heights .......he
is in collusion w/ Third World govts.....financing and facilitating the overthrow.

Our Founding Fathers wisely advocated against foreign entanglements.
George Washington famously argued that the US must "Act for ourselves and
not for others," by forming an "American character wholly free of foreign
attachments."

[Jane Long]

BTTT.

Invasion, indeed.

[Georgia Girl 2]

“Article V. There is no substitute”

10th Ammendment. No need to substitute anything.

Scalia by the way meant that the Congress is shirking their job of passing legislation by throwing everything to the courts to decide. Which is what they are doing.

[Bigg Red]

Here, Obama reveals himself, taking his America hatred to new heights .......he
is in collusion w/ Third World govts.....financing and facilitating the overthrow.

***
Exactly.

[machogirl]

thank you for the ping!

[Eagles6]

Yes.

[LucyT]

.

Ping.

Check out article and comments.

Obama would spare from deportation as many as 5 million people who are in the U.S. illegally......

To best understand what is going on, we need to call this what it is......and invasion of foreigners seeking to over throw the US govt. The ding-a-ling in the WH recognizes no laws-—he considers our laws to be a plot by evil white men to suppress “people of pallor.”

Here, Obama reveals himself, taking his America hatred to new heights .......he
is in collusion w/ Third World govts.....financing and facilitating the overthrow.

Our Founding Fathers wisely advocated against foreign entanglements.

Thanks, Liz.