Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Like US policy towards Israel under Obama? Look for more of the same under Jeb.
1 posted on 03/24/2015 8:13:41 AM PDT by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Rockitz

More evidence that there would be absolutely no difference between a Jeb Bush presidency and a Hillary! Clinton presidency, or an Obama presidency for that matter.


2 posted on 03/24/2015 8:14:58 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Jeb should just switch parties and run a Bush/Clinton or Clinton/Bush ticket and get it over with.


3 posted on 03/24/2015 8:16:48 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Baker is still alive?


5 posted on 03/24/2015 8:17:13 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Roman 13:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

What really upsets me is, like Romney, I just don’t see the GOP nominating anyone but Left Wing Jeb who will get slaughtered in the General.


7 posted on 03/24/2015 8:18:56 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Disgusting. If Bush does not repudiate this immediately, he is toast even before Iowa. Genesis 12:3. Even Maoabama is finding out there is a Power in the universe greater than him.


8 posted on 03/24/2015 8:19:33 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

When anyone criticizes me for being in favor of a third party, I like to say, “Hell, I’d be satisfied with a SECOND party.”


9 posted on 03/24/2015 8:19:44 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The FCC takeover of the internet will quickly become a means to censorship of dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Well, no Jeb Bush ... for sure ... just on that one basis!

James Baker slams Netanyahu’s ‘diplomatic missteps’ [Israel]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3271395/posts

Former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker harshly criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the J Street conference in Washington on Monday, echoing White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough’s comments earlier in the day.

Baker acknowledged his disappointment with “the lack of progress regarding a lasting peace,” saying that the chances for a two-state solution diminished since Netanyahu’s reelection last week.

Baker further slammed Netanyahu’s “diplomatic missteps and political gamesmanship,” saying that the prime minister’s “actions have not matched his rhetoric,” according to Politico.

Earlier in the day, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough offered a similar rebuke of Netanyahu – specifically the prime minister’s claims that no Palestinian state would be established on his watch.

“We cannot simply pretend that those comments were never made,” McDonough told the conference.

Baker continued by claiming that hardliners on both sides are the biggest impediment to peace.

I don’t care if Baker was Chief of Staff for Reagan and a former Secretary of the Treasury ... in Baker’s past history in regards to Israel ... Baker is an ANTI-SEMITE. Obama and Baker would get along just fine in regards to their attitudes towards Israel ... AND ... in terms of their attitudes towards the “right” in terms of Israel! AND THEN ... Baker talking to J Street, well ... what else is necessary to know?!


10 posted on 03/24/2015 8:21:30 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
What a total fool!

Baker said. Although UN Security Council resolutions ban any nuclear enrichment by Iran

How many UN Resolutions did Iraq's Saddam Hussein laugh at?

..a quick search says 16.
repeatedly violated sixteen United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs

1981: Israel bombs Baghdad nuclear reactor
The Israelis have bombed a French-built nuclear plant near Iraq's capital, Baghdad, saying they believed it was designed to make nuclear weapons to destroy Israel.

11 posted on 03/24/2015 8:23:18 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

You are known by the company you keep; get out of here, Jeb.


13 posted on 03/24/2015 8:25:43 AM PDT by Patriot777 (Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

I would like to think that Baker’s antisemitism does not reflect Jeb Bush’s political views. Unfortunately, I’m not that optimistic. Jeb seems happy to follow in Obama’s path, which is why Jeb will not have my vote, not even if it’s a Bush/Clinton election again.


14 posted on 03/24/2015 8:26:59 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

I can’t wait for Jebbie to crash and burn so we don’t have to read or talk about him anymore.


15 posted on 03/24/2015 8:27:58 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

After yesterday the slide to the right becomes an avalanche.


16 posted on 03/24/2015 8:36:29 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Heaven help us if this bum wins the nomination. He would be even worse than his father and brother.


17 posted on 03/24/2015 8:37:00 AM PDT by jpl ("You cannot defeat an enemy you do not admit exists." - Lt. General Michael Flynn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Good grief. Is Jeb Bush the candidate of the New World Order and does the New World Order want to destroy Israel? The way information is coming out about Jeb Bush, I see very little difference between him and Obama or Hillary. He sounds like a flaming leftist who has managed to tone down the rhetoric and appear non-threatening.


18 posted on 03/24/2015 8:38:19 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
That says it all, Jeb is just another antisemitic who will bend over backwards until his spine snaps to let in any Mexican Nationalist who walks across the border, but, hates Israel for being the only Democratic country in the Mideast and for loving America and the American people who stands up for itself and defends itself in the face of Obama and Jeb Bushes allies around the Mideast, e.g. Iran, and Syria!
19 posted on 03/24/2015 8:39:19 AM PDT by americanparatrooper (Remember your forth point of contact in a PLF and cover it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

I’ve been saying that Bush and Hillary share essentially the same political views right down the line.

Now it starts to look like he and Obama are on the same page. The idea that Repubs would nominate an anti-Israel candidate is beyond bizarre.


20 posted on 03/24/2015 8:40:37 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Jeb and his advisers are all dicks.

Cruz or lose....


21 posted on 03/24/2015 8:42:11 AM PDT by Bobalu (If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz
“If the only agreement is one under which Iran agrees to cease all enrichment, then there will likely be no agreement,” Baker said. Although UN Security Council resolutions ban any nuclear enrichment by Iran, Baker said Netanyahu’s position was too strict.

What mental acrobatics these frauds go through to oppose Israel.

So, Obama might go through the UN Security Council to avoid seeking approval from the US Senate, for an agreement that allows some nuclear enrichment by Iran.. But that would require that the Security Council approve a resolution and agreement that violates previous SC resolutions that ban any nuclear enrichment by Iran.

22 posted on 03/24/2015 8:43:26 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Jeb Bush POS.


23 posted on 03/24/2015 8:45:03 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Foolish people ... have eyes and see not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Most of the GOP, and especially these jerks right here, just absolutely repulse me.


26 posted on 03/24/2015 8:53:47 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson