Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Urge Banks to Call Cops on Customers Who Withdraw $5,000 or More
Tea Party ^ | 3/23/2015 | Staff

Posted on 03/24/2015 5:34:35 AM PDT by HomerBohn

The Justice Department is ordering bank employees to consider calling the cops on customers who withdraw $5,000 dollars or more, a chilling example of how the war on cash is intensifying.

Banks are already required to file ‘suspicious activity reports’ on their customers, with threats of fines and even jail time for directors if financial institutions don’t meet quotas.

But as investor and financial blogger Simon Black points out, last week, “A senior official from the Justice Department spoke to a group of bankers about the need for them to rat out their customers to the police.”

SPECIAL: Make Barack Hussein Obama pay for his crimes against America. How much are you willing to take before you stand up and do something? This is your opportunity to be a true Patriot. Support the Tea Party Constitution Fund.

Assistant attorney general Leslie Caldwell gave a speech in which he urged banks to “alert law enforcement authorities about the problem” so that police can “seize the funds” or at least “initiate an investigation”.

As Black highlights, according to the handbook for the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council, such suspicious activity includes, “Transactions conducted or attempted by, at, or through the bank (or an affiliate) and aggregating $5,000 or more…”

Black provides a chilling scenario under which an attempt to withdraw your own money from your bank account could end with a home visit from the cops.

“As you pull into your driveway later there’s an unexpected surprise waiting for you: two police officers would like to have a word with you about your intended withdrawal earlier,” writes Black, who accuses banks of already operating as “unpaid government spies”.

“Do you need to withdraw cash to purchase a used car from a private seller? Or perhaps you are pulling out some emergency cash for a loved one,” writes Mac Slavo.

“Either one of these activities are now considered suspicious and if your cash withdrawal amounts to even a few thousand dollars your bank teller is under a legal requirement to alert officials about your suspected criminal activity. And before you argue that you can’t possibly be a suspect because you have done nothing wrong, consider that even being suspected of being a suspect is now enough to land you on a terrorist watchlist in America.”

The war on cash is intensifying as authorities attempt to crack down on one of the few remaining modes of anonymity.

Over in France, Finance Minister Michel Sapin hailed the introduction of measures set to come into force in September which will restrict French citizens from making cash payments over 1,000 euros.

The new regulations, introduced in the name of fighting terrorism, will also see cash deposits of over 10,000 euros during a single month reported to anti-fraud authorities.

Meanwhile, in the UK, HSBC is now interrogating its account holders on how they earn and spend their money as well as restricting large cash withdrawals for customers from £5000 upwards.

Back in America, purchasing Amtrak train tickets with cash is being treated as a suspicious activity as part of a number of behaviors that are “indicative of criminal activity”.

Banks are also making it harder for customers to withdraw and deposit cash, with Chase imposing new capital controls that mandate identification for cash deposits and ban cash being deposited into another person’s account.

In October 2013, we also reported on how Chase instituted policy changes which banned international wire transfers while restricting cash activity for business customers (both deposits and withdrawals) to a $50,000 limit per statement cycle.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: banks; finance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: JimRed
Yep. Here's how I do it...

Just kidding.

61 posted on 03/24/2015 11:23:19 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
If it was all on one place, yep, but that is spread out over 3 months minimum, so it's like 6 cents/day in the parking lot. That won't make much difference in my life. Maybe it does, to some. I'm not going to put much effort into 6 cents a day. ;)

/johnny

62 posted on 03/24/2015 11:30:22 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Got news for you, you withdraw 10k or more the fed gets notified, has been that way for years!

The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (or BSA, or otherwise known as the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act) requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering.

Specifically, the act requires financial institutions to keep records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, and file reports of cash purchases of these negotiable instruments of more than $10,000 (daily aggregate amount), and to report suspicious activity that might signify money laundering, tax evasion, or other criminal activities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_Secrecy_Act

63 posted on 03/24/2015 11:38:59 AM PDT by Ken H (DILLIGAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
It’d take a month for the Feds to wise up that they were wasting six million reports a week on this banking report deal.

No, they will never consider it a waste, just something to spend more on. Look at how the supposedly innocuous and unobtrusive firearms registry in Canada mushroomed into a multi-billion dollar debacle. There are still Canadian gov't bureaucrats who are sure if they just threw more money at it the whole thing would have worked out positively.

64 posted on 03/24/2015 12:21:47 PM PDT by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Minutemen

In either case, it is to save themselves at your expense.


65 posted on 03/24/2015 3:22:08 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Have a credit card which is hardly ever used.
Stopped using debit card and went strictly cash in June, 2013.

Don’t miss not using the debit card. Still carry it in case of emergency.

Have to remember to visit ATM often enough to pay cash for all the day to day stuff.

Wish there was an easy way of paying monthly bills with cash.


66 posted on 03/26/2015 5:37:21 PM PDT by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson