Replies

I don’t know whether it is what I quoted about the Bushes, or the mere mention of Alex Jones. Is Jones a non-person on FR?

“Alex Jones is forever banned from FR. He’s a dipweed 9/11 conspiracy nutcase. These freaks make good money just making shit up for the gullible. Not surprised liberaltarians fall for any anti-American crap that comes down the line.

Those who don’t like my position on this are welcome to post elsewhere.”

47 posted on 4/9/2014 2:40:54 PM by Jim Robinson

I don’t know whether it is what I quoted about the Bushes, or the mere mention of Alex Jones. Is Jones a non-person on FR?

Your "dark" Bush post is still there.

I don't know the policy on Jones. I haven't noticed them getting deleted specifically. It's neither here nor there to me because Jones is not a key source of info for me.

When I post information, claims, etc., regarding the financial elites of this world, frequently I get sarcastic responses hinting that I get my info from Jones' website, but I've never posted anything from that website, other than perhaps a couple mistaken posts a couple years ago when I was first exploring new world order, trying to separate the wheat from the chaff as far as true information goes.

Though occasionally his site comes up in search results and I may skim an article here or there, it happens so infrequently that it's safe to say that I basically don't use the site.

His site is just not part of the research that I do. There are a few other popular sites that go on about new world order that I basically never look at, for the same reason: they include alien, etc., claims, thus it's usually too cumbersome to separate out the few true points their articles make from all the fluff.

In gaining my limited understanding of new world order I've used mostly old news articles, books, info on the web like blogs/websites that comes from individuals posting firsthand or secondhand accounts they are aware of regarding small pieces of the overall structure. To confirm historical facts which tested some of my hypotheses I've had along the way, I searched for and found some historical documents like company records, correspondence, etc. The real wacky one was a Herbert Hoover telegram regarding the Belgian Relief Commission's pleadings for "boot material for the children of Belgium". To the unaware, it sounds innocuous enough, but of course with just a bit of simple logic applied, the thing proves that the Commission was a complete farce and Hoover was a Rothschild operative and that WWI was artificially prolonged on a grand scale. But many people can't see the simple logic because they think of war in more in a Hollywood sense than anything even vaguely resembling the reality of military logistics.

I've never taken any piece of information for fact, just kept it in mind as I analyzed the whole pile of info: the people and organizations involved and the relationships between them.

A few people have let me know that they review my posts from time to time, which tells me that there are undoubtedly lurkers following as well.

I do not get much time to research nowadays. I do try to occasionally relate current topics to nwo, where the relationship is strong and where posters seem to be oblivious to reality, that is, they are all caught up in politics and don't appear to realize that it is, at the highest level, pretty much a front for those who are really calling the shots. As long as the public thinks politicians are their true rulers, public anger will end with the politician and not extend beyond that to the power figures that are politically behind the scenes, even though they are in plain sight.