She's losing at least one moderate vote a day. And Giuliani just swooped in to try to shore her up.
To: cotton1706
I really hope so. This issue doesn’t require the assembly of half a dozen neurons. This is exactly the kind of person who should not be AG. She has disqualified herself with her own words. NEC. Not Even Close.
2 posted on
03/18/2015 5:38:38 AM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
To: cotton1706
We need to be lighting up the phone lines in the Senate on this issue.
I've called mine.....have you called yours?
3 posted on
03/18/2015 5:39:50 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: cotton1706
Better a critically damaged Holder than a emboldened partisan.
5 posted on
03/18/2015 5:42:28 AM PDT by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: cotton1706
Can’t believe Guiliani did this. Disgusting.
6 posted on
03/18/2015 5:42:39 AM PDT by
elcid1970
("I am a radicalized infidel. My bullets are dipped in pig grease.")
To: cotton1706
Giuliani supports this bigot?
7 posted on
03/18/2015 5:43:54 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Hillary 2016! Because we don't have anybody else! - The DNC donors)
To: cotton1706
As a Georgian, I EXPECT BOTH of my Senators to vote against any recommendation or confirmation, whether out of a committee or in a floor vote for ANY Obama nominee for the remainder of this tyrant’s term.
11 posted on
03/18/2015 5:59:26 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: cotton1706
Lets hope so.....I mean if they confirm her without her repudiating Holders actions then they are no different than DEms.
13 posted on
03/18/2015 6:00:34 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: cotton1706
Mcnuts is now trying to rush this to a vote where the witch still has a chance to be confirmed. I guess he gets bonus points from the king if he pushes her through.
17 posted on
03/18/2015 6:17:51 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: cotton1706
Is the Loretta Lynch nomination unraveling? Note to the Examiner, and all conservative writers:
Enough with the passive writing already. It's time to push the meme.
This headline should have been:
Loretta Lynch nomination is unraveling.
Don't leave the reader wondering. Leave the reader with the lingering impression that it's a done deal. Others will be more likely to hop on the bandwagon if they believe it's already happening.
It's how the Left shapes opinions in their journalism. It's what you should be doing, too.
-PJ
25 posted on
03/18/2015 6:46:49 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: cotton1706
Its crazy that the Senate would cooperate with 0 on anything given the way he is trashing the Constitutional rights and duties of the senate.
26 posted on
03/18/2015 7:20:01 AM PDT by
fungoking
(Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
To: cotton1706
She’s a thousand miles of bad road.
27 posted on
03/18/2015 7:59:51 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Gore: Punish those who buck 'accepted science' as was done to Galileo Galilei -freeper Darksheare)
To: cotton1706
33 posted on
03/18/2015 1:31:04 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson