Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The House Oversight Committee may subpoena Hillary as early as today.

it's almost too agonizing, the waiting, for this grandest of schadenfreude visual spectacles to commence.

You can keep your gladiator games.

BUWHAWHAWHAHAHAHAHAAWHAWHAWHAWHA!

1 posted on 03/13/2015 10:35:44 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lbryce

Why no red flags???

Because Obama and Clinton are two of the most vicious and brutal politicians this nation has ever had. They will destroy ANYONE who gets in the way of their progressive utopia. Any lowly official that dare question the queen and queen, I mean king, would find themselves unemployed and on the streets of DC.


2 posted on 03/13/2015 10:39:29 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

For any government official to say ‘it’s too confusing’ and it’s not illegal....they are simply bluffing their way out of the argument.

What is the entire purpose of the Blackberry program? Why are thousands upon thousands of Blackberries issued out in the DC region?

Why are protection of government documents (digital and paper-copy) are so important that the Congress even wrote a law to cover these?

What is the purpose of back-ups of email servers....that we have laws in place requiring such behavior and efforts?

A twelve-year-old kid can argue about this being a disconnect. A mature adult cannot argue this. The effort to suggest two cellphone devices were too hard to handle? If you are such a marginal person who can’t handle two email accounts or two cellphones....you’ve got probably over twenty-thousand DC players who fall into this category of being able to handle.... more than capable of handling SUCH responsibilities. Obviously, she’s not capable of handing such duties, which makes you wonder what else she’s not capable of handling.


3 posted on 03/13/2015 10:44:52 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Everybody knew about it...but no one said anything. The Liberals have a better “code of silence” than the Mafia!


5 posted on 03/13/2015 10:48:30 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Wow. Incompetence is apparently the excuse for our government to fail to protect its own secrets. To fail to enforce its own laws. Next step will be just ignorance for all laws. And this is the only government on the planet to ever actually nuke another nation. No wonder Putin is in hiding.


6 posted on 03/13/2015 10:50:44 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way. Was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

it’s almost too agonizing, the waiting, for this grandest of schadenfreude visual spectacles to commence.


This is kinda how I felt before the Zimmerman trial, only this time it’s much more exciting.


7 posted on 03/13/2015 10:51:55 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
emailing more than 100 government officials

Those are not the emails of concern, as they are likely stored/archived on the receiving government servers.

The emails of question are those regarding The Clinton Foundation and whether Mrs. Secretary used her position to coerce or influence donations to said foundation.

Those are likely some of the 30,000 emails that were deleted from the Clinton server.


8 posted on 03/13/2015 10:53:08 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

..because they had a shadow government to run, hidden from the prying eyes of the people and the media. Committing treason requires communications to be HIDDEN. She was Morsi’s strongest ally, along with Huma. That ALONE was a huge red flag of treason.


10 posted on 03/13/2015 10:55:46 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Didn’t each recipient have a positive obligation to report an apparent violation of policy and law?


15 posted on 03/13/2015 11:04:28 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Why? Because many people in the administration do it, because they have private agendas and dealings they wish to keep secret. It’s the new omerta.


17 posted on 03/13/2015 11:08:44 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Like, who was willing to turn a clintoon in and get fosterized for jeopardizing her shot at the wh?


20 posted on 03/13/2015 11:12:41 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

” questions are mounting over why administration and government information security officials apparently did little to nudge her back into using the government system “

BECAUSE most of them were ‘migrating’ away from the government system.


21 posted on 03/13/2015 11:12:51 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It’s cuz very many people detect that some time ago we all tacitly agreed to become a nation of men and not laws.

So all who received the emails and saw the discrepancy were afraid to say anything.

THIS is how dictatorships arise - how the Nazis could take over Germany.


23 posted on 03/13/2015 11:25:47 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
Seems to me if only one party was using a personal email account (Clinton), then either the receiver (from Clinton) or the sender (to Clinton) has that email on a government account...

unless both (sender and receiver) were using personal accounts...that's even worse...

24 posted on 03/13/2015 11:25:59 AM PDT by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
the responsibility for email systems is so far-flung across the government that it's unclear whether any one person or agency could be accountable.

“What we have here is a lack of clear ownership of both IT infrastructure and the ability to enforce specific policies within the government

It's OBVIOUS that the best solution here is the creation of a totally new Federal bureaucracy and the appointment of a "Cyber Czar" – preferably a woman of color, taken from academe, with experience in fund-raising & a demonstrated ability to follow the Party line ......

25 posted on 03/13/2015 11:49:38 AM PDT by mikrofon (Weekend BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
Security wasn't a big priority for Hill.

Blow-by-Blow: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die

"Nordstrom further testified in writing that Hillary Clinton waived security requirements for the Benghazi consulate despite high and critical threat levels in the six categories of security standards established under the Overseas Security Policy Board and the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999. The waiver can only be authorized by the Secretary of State, who cannot delegate that responsibility to someone else. ”If the Secretary of State did not waive these requirements, who did so by ordering occupancy of the facilities in Benghazi and Tripoli?” Nordstrom wrote."


26 posted on 03/13/2015 12:29:52 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I thought he had been promoted to Lt. Colonel.


27 posted on 03/13/2015 12:48:34 PM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Hillary Clinton was emailing more than 100 government officials for four years on a personal account. Her office even says the practice was “widely known” to those colleagues, since her address was visible.

Sounds like a conspiracy to me. {;^)

So why no red flags?
Silence is acquiescence.

32 posted on 03/13/2015 3:14:43 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson