Posted on 03/05/2015 6:49:00 PM PST by BAW
Hillary Clinton appears to have established multiple email addresses for her private use, and possibly the use of her aides, under the domain of “clintonemail.com,” according to a prominent member of the hacking community who supplied independent research data, conducted with high-tech tools, to Fox News.
The hacker used an open-source tool, publicly available, called “The Harvester” to search a variety of data sources – including well-known platforms such as Google, Bing, LinkedIn, Twitter and others – for any stored references to email addresses seen using a particular domain, in this case clintonemail.com. Hackers working under contract for private firms, also known as “White Hat hackers,” routinely use The Harvester during so-called “penetration testing,” or “pen testing,” on behalf of clients trying to ensure that their internal systems are secure.
The application of The Harvester to clintonemail.com revealed additional email addresses besides the one that Clinton aides have insisted publicly that she used, and have said was the only one that she used, when she served as Secretary of State: namely, hdr22@clintonemail.com.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
You’ve given me hope!
You’ve given me hope!
If your objective is to avoid having communications archived and subject to subpoena, it does little good if the other persons you communicate with is on a .gov address, because HIS copy of the email will be archived. To be secure, ALL parties to the communication must be on private servers.
Tracking this down would lead to interesting data.
Unfortunate terminology in regard to the Clintoons.....
The only reason we’re allowed to know this is because somebody wants people to know it.
You would think that Republicans had to know about this too...heck everyone who ever got an email from her or her buddies would have seen it came from clintonemail.com.....
If Congress subpoenas Hillary’s private server e mails they have a better chance of Russia who probably is already in possession of them producing them than Hillary.Perhaps they should skip all the drama with Hillary hiding them and send the subpoena directly to Vladamir.
Oh, Lord! She is such a crook.
Why would any sentient, rational person even consider this worthless, soulless individual as a presidential candidate?
Have the Democrats collectively lost their minds?
Oh, my! The Native-American woman is creeping up on Hillary! LOLPIMP!!!
How long did anyone think “clintonemail.com” was going to go without being targeted?
“I saw in an article today that after she left the State Department that she transferred the domain name to an offsite server rather than her private one.”
I’d be willing to wager - if anyone connected with it has a room-temperature IQ - that the original server has already been reduced to tiny bits of shiny metal by now.
Most people aren’t going to hear about it, because of the Partisan Media Shills. First denial, then oh that it isn’t particularly significant, and finally that ancient history? We did too cover that, it was nothing.
There would have to be strict rules regarding the emails.
For example, you cannot download the emails to your computer but must keep them on the server.
2. You cannot forward emails from a server address to anyone outside the server address.
3. Maybe even prohibiting emails to any outside address.
I’m wondering if these safeguards could be built into the server itself whereby the above would be automatic?
You’re right, it makes no sense to have your own server if you only have one email account. The fact that she had one with the no 22 tells you there were several.
Would be easy to subpoena her staff to find out what the rules were.
Just a thought, < humor >, would it not be interesting if our commander in chief was doing the same with private emails as hitlery? < /end humor >
I think he's smarter than that. "Never write an email when you can talk. Never meet in the White House (where visitors are logged) when you can meet elsewhere" (paraphrasing the Mob maxims).
Did you really think he likes hanging out on golf courses because he loves golf so much?
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) on Sunday suggested that Hillary Clinton could face criminal charges if she knowingly withholds emails from congressional investigators.
Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Issa noted that “voluntary cooperation does not guarantee that it’s a crime not to deliver all” requested emails.
“A subpoena, which Trey Gowdy issued, is so that in fact it will be a crime if she knowingly withholds documents pursuant to subpoena,” Issa said.
The former House Oversight Committee chairman issued three subpoenas related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks, he said, acknowledging the House Select Committee on Benghazi last week subpoenaed all of Clinton’s emails during her tenure as secretary of State.
Clinton last week called on the State Department to release the 55,000 pages of her emails that she self-selected and turned over. State has turned over about 900 pages to the committee.
Issa argued that Clinton “wasn’t forthcoming two and a half years ago.”
“She, in fact, hid the very existence of this until she was caught,” Issa said.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who sits on the House Benghazi committee, pushed back on CNN.
“They issued a subpoena for records we already have,” Schiff said. “We’ve read them. There’s nothing in them.”
“What is the law at the time? The law at the time was that she could use her personal email as long as she preserved it,” Schiff said, arguing “she clearly did preserve her emails.”
“In my view, this was not provided in response to The New York Times article or anything else. This was provided last year when a request went out to the state department and all former secretaries,” Schiff said.
“She followed the law in place at the time, and I think that’s, I think, the relevant point.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ONE CAN HOPE!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.