Spread Islam by sword.....
Yes.
yes
If the victims of Islam had been more Islamophobic, maybe they would still be alive??
I don’t think it’s an issue of people pandering to islam. I think it’s an issue of islamists supporting other islamists.
islam supports what the left supports. Control.
It’s all about control.
If I control you, then I have no cause to fear you.
If you are a free man, and I as well. I have cause to fear you.
It’s all control, layers and layers of it.
If you can control everyone, then you have absolute power, and you need not fear anyone.
Look at any and all muslim culture. It is quite easy to see. They are repressive and extrememly violent.
An honest person knows that this question doesn’t need to be asked. It’s as plain as the sun rising, setting, and the sky is blue.
In the history of stupidly obvious questions this one has to take the cake.
I've never heard anyone complain about the koranimals being taught to kick ass, or to break windows, or to act violent.
They ARE taught to kill by decapitation.
In my dealings with Arabs, they don’t like violence and don’t even like strong demonstrative interaction.
My experience is they like American Southerners better than yankees simply because southerners tend to be laid back and don’t get in your face
Non Moslem People read the koran and reach false conclusions
If the civilized world is to survive, it must recognize Islam for what it really is: It’s not a religion, form of government, or anything recognizable to the civilized mind. Islam is a disease, an incurable disease of the mind that is highly contagious among the feeble minded and is now spreading among the world’s feeble minded at an epidemic rate. As with any disease, one can’t reason with this disease, negotiate with it, or treat in any manner other than how one would treat any other incurable disease.
Past efforts to contain this disease have failed. Now, carriers of this Plague of Islam must be eradicated wherever they're found, for if they're not, this disease will eventually end not just Western Civilization, but it will undo over 5,000 years of human civilization.
Islam doesn’t use the Suzuki method for teaching violins?
Quran (2:191-193) - “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - “idtihad” - and oppression - a variation of “z-l-m” - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from “fitna” which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until “religion is for Allah” - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”
Quran (2:216) - “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran (3:56) - “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
Quran (3:151) - “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).
Quran (4:74) - “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.
Quran (4:76) - “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”
And I could go on .....
yes.
their convert or die demand.
all human life not equal and kaffir can be killed like animals.
jihad.
the whole damn thing is evil and twisted.
Islam is a religion of violent and immediate I forcemeat and conversion. Death is at the center of a violent orgy of belief. Read what they say.
Violence was certainly a primary tool of Mohamed and his followers from the inception of Islam in the 7th century and all through the following 7 centuries.
Based on history, yes. Mohammed used violence to spread islam.
Apparently this history is too much for muslim appeasers.
Rabid dogs need killing
Why do we continue to ask that silly question?
Read the Koran about cutting off the heads of Christians and Jews and compare it with the history of Islam.