Skip to comments.
Gabby Giffords: Everyone Should Have to Pass Background Check My Attacker Passed
Breitbart.com ^
| 03/04/2015
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 03/04/2015 1:59:57 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
On Wednesday, gun control advocate Gabby Giffords stood with Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill to demand that everyone buying a gun be required to undergo the same background check Jared Loughner underwent to acquire the Glock he used to shoot her in 2011.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; giffords
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum; ConservingFreedom
Another dope head thread. Loughner was a marijuana user.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So, liberals shouldn’t be able to own guns? Works for me.
3
posted on
03/04/2015 2:02:38 PM PST
by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
her husband should have taught her how to duck.
4
posted on
03/04/2015 2:02:49 PM PST
by
hadaclueonce
(Ethanol is stupid. "Does the money show?")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I thought Gabby was hit by a 22lr.
5
posted on
03/04/2015 2:05:13 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Brain damage is a terrible thing. Poor Gabby.
6
posted on
03/04/2015 2:05:15 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
‘cuz that worked out so well for her, him being scrutinized so much, right?
7
posted on
03/04/2015 2:05:38 PM PST
by
NEMDF
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Remember that she wasn’t all that bright before she got shot in the head by one of the children of her Progressive constituents.
8
posted on
03/04/2015 2:06:40 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(Truth is treason in the Empire of lies. - Ron Paul)
To: DiogenesLamp
Thought those kind of druggies were all peaceful or so I am told
9
posted on
03/04/2015 2:07:00 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Give it up Gabby. No need to keep putting your self on display in front of the cameras. Why don’t you and your ex-astronaut go buy that Llama Farm you’ve been dreaming of?
Go for it!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
She really did take one to the head, didn’t she?
11
posted on
03/04/2015 2:08:58 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
To: Paladin2
12
posted on
03/04/2015 2:11:17 PM PST
by
gundog
(Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yes indeed, stricter background checks would definitely stop deranged individuals from acquiring firearms. Just like all those strict firearm laws in France stopped those Muzzie killers from getting automatic weapons. Works real good. (snicker)
13
posted on
03/04/2015 2:17:02 PM PST
by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Liberal sympathizers are unsympathetic to the argument from the Bush administration that a post-9/11 world requires expanded executive authority to suspend habeas corpus and detain individuals indefinitely, or to eavesdrop on Americans’ phone conversations, or to torture terrorist suspects. In those instances the Bush administration says the need to protect Americans from wanton violence justifies infringing on American liberties. But liberals are quite adamant that saving lives is not a sufficient rationale for abandoning principles.
Yet when the subject turns to the right of American citizens to own guns, many liberals suddenly find that the goal of saving lives justifies just that.
14
posted on
03/04/2015 2:17:44 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because the background check was so effective at stopping him from getting a gun?
15
posted on
03/04/2015 2:18:24 PM PST
by
kennedy
(No relation to those other Kennedys.)
To: DiogenesLamp
Loughner was more than that..............
16
posted on
03/04/2015 2:19:33 PM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Shoot a liberal in the head? It's only a flesh wound.
17
posted on
03/04/2015 2:20:30 PM PST
by
OSHA
(One despises and wants to destroy the United States, the other is a dead terrorist.)
To: hadaclueonce
I’m just going to say it,,,,that comment was totally insensitive and wrong!!
18
posted on
03/04/2015 2:20:51 PM PST
by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
To: All
19
posted on
03/04/2015 2:21:08 PM PST
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: kennedy
The background check is about registering guns and gun owners.
20
posted on
03/04/2015 2:22:53 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson