Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2015 10:55:22 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

2 posted on 03/04/2015 10:56:15 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Technically, that is not germane.


3 posted on 03/04/2015 10:57:22 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

...how bad will we make things if we rule against the government?


Technically, that is not germane.


4 posted on 03/04/2015 10:57:40 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

They will find some way to side with Obama and Hope they can stay out of the Gulag


7 posted on 03/04/2015 11:01:57 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
BOHICA!
12 posted on 03/04/2015 11:12:08 AM PST by matthew fuller (They do not call the GOP the stupid party without reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
seemed to concede the dire consequences that could follow, by suggesting ways to alleviate it.

That's not their job. Their job is to interpret the law.

13 posted on 03/04/2015 11:13:07 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
“If your argument is accepted,” Kennedy told Carvin, and “the states were told to establish exchanges in order to receive money [for their citizens] or send the insurance market into a death spiral; isn’t that coercion? Under your argument, there would be a serious constitutional problem.”

But the problem isn't with the argument, it's with the statute. It only provides another reason to strike it down. That's the point to make to Kennedy.

14 posted on 03/04/2015 11:15:15 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
The one thing that is most disconcerting about SCOTUS is that there is always 4 votes for the libs, and then they only need one vote to win.

They NEVER judge a case on its merits or on the Constitution, what a disgrace.

Three bitches and a fag, what a combo.

16 posted on 03/04/2015 11:48:38 AM PST by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

This will not end well.

First, I do not think Roberts will vote to gut Obamacare after the lengths he went to last time to rewrite the whole thing as just one big tax bill. From oral arguments this morning, it appears that Kennedy will also flip this time. So it is extremely likely that the Court will rewrite Obamacare to extend the subsidies by either a 5/4 or 6/3 vote.

In the unlikely event that the Court actually follows the law and throws out the subsidies then we will have a replay of the amnesty budget debacle.

The Democrats and the lamestream media will loudly blame the evil Republicans for stealing subsidies and insurance from millions of poor people who are now relying on it. The House will respond by passing a bill extending subsidies for this year and then terminating or scaling back Obamacare. The Democrats in the Senate will insist on a “clean” bill just extending the subsidies.

The Republicans will then cave and that will be that.


17 posted on 03/04/2015 11:54:50 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

There is only one thing we can count on —

AT THE END, after all the work, legal maneuvers and arguments, THE REPUBLICANS WILL CAVE.


19 posted on 03/04/2015 1:10:42 PM PST by Gator113 (Cruz, Lee, and Sessions speak for me.... most anyone else is just noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

seemed to concede the dire consequences that could follow

Supreme court’s function should not be concerned with the ramifications of their interpretation of law. Their job is to decide constitutionality of the issue before them, little else.


20 posted on 03/04/2015 4:54:04 PM PST by Joan Kerrey (The larger the government, the smaller the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson