“The legitimacy of the judiciary is undermined when a judge legislates from the bench or usurps the power reserved to the states regarding natural marriage,”
This really is a key issue here, how can you respect a bunch of tyrants in black robes who simply wave their wands to wipe away centeriese of law and institutional order in favor of some extremely new and unprecedented idea?
If the Federal Constitution ever prohibited the definition of marriage you would think someone would have noticed between 150 and 200 years ago. This is where perhaps one of the key rules of common law comes into place, Past practice and tradition being the observed rule to keep ‘judges’ from legislation.
But of course the only aspect of Common law such tyrants insist on upholding is to effect the enforcement of their own edicts by other judges. We have a word for that in the English language, its called hypocritical legislative corruption not justice.
It is the greatest failing of our government and perhaps the society around it that we tolerate this highly destructive and anti-republican form of corruption to the extent that we actually honor & respect such clearly lawless edicts. Doing so empowers such dictators and encourages still more lawlessness undermining the very possibility of a free and civil Government of the people limited by written Constitutional law.
Thus contrary to what lawyers say people who uphold such edicts are not upholding the law as written 150 years ago but changing that law as rewritten 10 minutes ago by an unelescted Federal employee in a black robe. That is not democracy, nor is it Republican Constitutionalism in any form. That is tyranny and it will lead only to more tyranny by the same means not law & order.
The judicial supremacist lie is destroying the republic. I’ve been preaching that for years now, but for somebody not to see it at this point it’s pretty much got to be willful blindness.