The judicial supremacist lie is destroying the republic. I’ve been preaching that for years now, but for somebody not to see it at this point it’s pretty much got to be willful blindness.
“The judicial supremacist lie is destroying the republic. I’ve been preaching that for years now, but for somebody not to see it at this point it’s pretty much got to be willful blindness.”
You have to lack the ability or inclination to follow history, read the text of the law, and pay attention to arguments. in order to know:
1: What the text actually says.
2: What was practiced for the last 200 years.
3: What the Federal Employee in black robes just did with the same text.
Most people never get past #1, although a lot of people have a vage understanding of #2(we were in fact a lot freer in the past) most are actual quite ignorant of everything about our history and even geography. #3 is known only to a minority in its results and of course is useless if you know nothing of #1 much less #2.
Like the Catholic church a thousand years ago few if anyone can/will read the bible or any other history to know the church leaders have been radically changing it to fit their own goals.
Thus the source of our problem is primary historical and textual ignorance.
An ignorance that the self-corrupted ‘legal community’ has made their carriers out of exploiting. Exploiting not only as the sole means to ‘navigate’ the otherwise indecipherable complex linguistic ‘maze’ corrupt’judges’ have created over the years to impose their own will upon the law with the help of theses same lawyers.
Frankly the contradictory and indecipherable complexity of the language they have created alone is itself a form of tyranny particularly given the high price of legal representation and the mere expectation that the common man should have to follow the law to avoid such a need for legal representation in the first place. Even police men are incapable of actually understanding and honestly enforcing the law because of the sheer scale of linguistic corruption imposed upon it by ‘judges’ over the years, and that is their profession!
This broad concept of legal entrapment by way of excessive and contradictory legal linguistic complexity that almost everyone is aware is really just a symptom of the corruption of the court as arrogated over decades if not a century of dishonest of law making. But of course few people were around to remember what the same law meant and thus have no idea the degree to which it has been changed not justly by the Congress or the people, but rather unjustly by the Federal ‘courts’ & lawyers who have paradoxically claimed as part of their profession ‘expertise’ knowlage as to denouce anyone who might question their ever more dangerously expansive power over the people.
The point is there are 3 kinds of obliterates they exploit:
1: Our ignorance of the Republican system
2: Our ignorance of the laws as written.
3: Our Ignorance of the laws as demonstrated(practiced & understood) over time.
Theses are perhaps not ironically the 3 pillars of common law jurist prudence that is now corruptly ignored by the modern Federal employee in a black robes. Instead the only aspect of common law they follow and claim to understand is what the higher court said most recently. In other words not any part of common law jurist prudence but a hierarchy.
We need to expose their corruption, and work to undermined in the minds of the willing the legitimacy of the modern Federal ‘court’ system. While respecting the unjust power of this corrupt system of magistrates we should not hesitate to criticize that corruption and sympathize with its victims. It is the opinion of the people we must arose against the corruption of the Federal ‘courts’ system. and from the people we shall find new ways to resist and restore the power of the people to govern themselves by law rather than men.