Skip to comments.
California justices void blanket ban on where sex offenders can live
L.A. Times ^
| March 3, 2015
| MAURA DOLAN
Posted on 03/04/2015 6:20:21 AM PST by MeshugeMikey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
isnt that special
To: MeshugeMikey
They are dumbing down deviancy, a favorite pastime of liberals.
2
posted on
03/04/2015 6:24:24 AM PST
by
immadashell
(The inmates are running the asylum.)
To: MeshugeMikey
2,000 feet is too far. It’s basically a bill that requires people to commit suicide.
3
posted on
03/04/2015 6:25:09 AM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: immadashell
theres a giant crack in the wall of moral defense..and its widening far more rapidly than I could have imagined
4
posted on
03/04/2015 6:26:13 AM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
And yet another reason I’m glad we left Cali.
5
posted on
03/04/2015 6:27:16 AM PST
by
CAluvdubya
(<------- has now left CA for NV, where God and guns have not been outlawed! "The Miracle of America")
To: MeshugeMikey
This might sound crazy, but if they’re that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?
6
posted on
03/04/2015 6:29:32 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: MeshugeMikey
“Morals? We don't need no stinkin’ morals.”
7
posted on
03/04/2015 6:30:32 AM PST
by
immadashell
(The inmates are running the asylum.)
To: Jonty30
2,000 feet is too far. Its basically a bill that requires people to commit suicide. Or move out of state.
I'd have limited it to people whose sexual offenses involved children, though.
Other deviants don't pose much of a risk to anyone/thing that doesn't fit their particular deviancy template.
And child molesters do have a very high recidivism rate.
8
posted on
03/04/2015 6:31:11 AM PST
by
null and void
( If race doesn't matter, why does it matter so much?)
To: Wolfie
crazy NOT!
THe repeat rate amongst convicted offenders is no laughing matter.
California is on the brink..of utter and complete anarchy!
9
posted on
03/04/2015 6:34:33 AM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Wolfie
This might sound crazy, but if they're that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?Agreed. (minority of one here) I don't like these bans. We're supposed to be a nation of forgiveness after a person has served their time and is not a threat to society. If a person is a threat, keep them imprisoned.
I agree with bans on working with children for those who abused children, as a condition of release.
10
posted on
03/04/2015 6:37:52 AM PST
by
grania
To: Wolfie
Many are out on a technicality.
To: MeshugeMikey
The perverts can live just about anywhere they want except where the wealthy politicians and judges reside.
12
posted on
03/04/2015 6:50:27 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Mark Steyn: "fundamentally transformed" is a euphemism for "wrecked beyond repair.")
To: null and void
I understand that and I could support a death penalty for sex offenses against children. I just have a problem with a less than honest justice system. If we are going to create conditions that are effectively death penalty conditions, than why not be upfront about what we really want as a penalty?
13
posted on
03/04/2015 6:55:50 AM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
Less Than 1.8K To Go
And The FReepathon Is Over
Please Donate!
14
posted on
03/04/2015 6:59:56 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: MeshugeMikey
Once again, the voters spoke and the courts told them to shut up. It happened with prop 108, anti-illegal immigration, prop 8, anti-gay marriage, and now this.
People like to badmouth California, but the people here have been trying for common sense for some time, and it keeps being thwarted.
15
posted on
03/04/2015 7:02:51 AM PST
by
married21
( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: married21
16
posted on
03/04/2015 7:24:32 AM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
There is a simple solution so that no one’s rights get violated.
Sex offenders (I’m talking serious sex offenders, not some made-up political classification) never again see the light of day.
No one has to track them. No little boys (or girls, as the case may be) are raped. Parents can sleep at night.
I can see no down side.
17
posted on
03/04/2015 9:05:01 AM PST
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
To: Wolfie
This might sound crazy, but if theyre that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?The same reasoning I use regarding infringements upon the second amendment. Anyone who can't be trusted to be armed should not be running around loose!
18
posted on
03/04/2015 9:26:02 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: chesley
the incidents of short sentences..are far too numerous.
if one perpetrates on a kid...thats ALL she wrote as far as Im concerned
19
posted on
03/04/2015 9:26:21 AM PST
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: MeshugeMikey
20
posted on
03/04/2015 9:31:51 AM PST
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson