To: MeshugeMikey
This might sound crazy, but if they’re that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?
6 posted on
03/04/2015 6:29:32 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
crazy NOT!
THe repeat rate amongst convicted offenders is no laughing matter.
California is on the brink..of utter and complete anarchy!
9 posted on
03/04/2015 6:34:33 AM PST by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Wolfie
This might sound crazy, but if they're that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?Agreed. (minority of one here) I don't like these bans. We're supposed to be a nation of forgiveness after a person has served their time and is not a threat to society. If a person is a threat, keep them imprisoned.
I agree with bans on working with children for those who abused children, as a condition of release.
10 posted on
03/04/2015 6:37:52 AM PST by
grania
To: Wolfie
Many are out on a technicality.
To: Wolfie
This might sound crazy, but if they’re that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?The same reasoning I use regarding infringements upon the second amendment. Anyone who can't be trusted to be armed should not be running around loose!
18 posted on
03/04/2015 9:26:02 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: Wolfie
This might sound crazy, but if they’re that dangerous then WHY ARE WE LETTING THEM OUT OF PRISON?
I agree. Either they're sane enough to live among the general populace, or they should still be locked up.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson