Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin said that our GOP Senators should suspend the filibuster to pass DHS without Amnesty
March 2, 2015 | Ralph Mitchell

Posted on 03/02/2015 5:41:49 AM PST by mitchell001

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2015 5:41:49 AM PST by mitchell001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

I AGREE!”Dingy Harry”did it;why can’t we???????????????


2 posted on 03/02/2015 5:44:00 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Mitch “The Tortoise” McConnell will never have that much moxie. This tortoise will never catch up to the hare, Reid, who is still running the Senate.


3 posted on 03/02/2015 5:45:19 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

That would take courage and a sense of honor.


4 posted on 03/02/2015 5:45:38 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

That would require a backbone and guts. The GOPe have neither.


5 posted on 03/02/2015 5:45:40 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

I suppose I’ll be corrected if I’m mistaken, but I thought funding bills weren’t subject to the 60 vote cloture rule.


6 posted on 03/02/2015 5:46:58 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Our friend Principled gave me these links. Please CALL.

alpha by state: https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?OrderBy=state

alpha by Senator: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

find ‘em
call ‘em
hound ‘em


7 posted on 03/02/2015 5:47:15 AM PST by mitchell001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

It’s a two-step process. First budget (early in the year) then appropriations (late in the year)

Budget bills are subject to Reconciliation, which is a simple majority vote.

This is an appropriations bill, which isn’t and still subject to filibuster.


8 posted on 03/02/2015 5:51:40 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Ted Cruz was right. He said the GOP didn’t want to defund and that this was all theatre. How else do you explain attaching the defunding to DHS? They could have done it any number of ways, and they chose the one that is most politically expedient for them to fold on.

No way they change the filibuster rules. This is all just a show.


9 posted on 03/02/2015 5:52:51 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Victor. Reconciliation is used to bypass filibusters when taking up budget bills such as DHS. The following is a Wikipedia definition of Reconciliation. By the way, Reconciliation was used to pass Obamacare.

Reconciliation is a legislative process of the United States Senate intended to allow consideration of a budget bill with debate limited to twenty hours under Senate rules.[1] Reconciliation also exists in the United States House of Representatives, but because the House regularly passes rules that constrain debate and amendment, the process has had a less significant impact on that body.


10 posted on 03/02/2015 5:53:13 AM PST by mitchell001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Ted Cruz had a much better idea: attach the anti amnesty provisions to the appropriations for an agency that is easier, politically, to shut down than DHS (even if 85% of DHS stays open)

He recommended EPA, but IMHO IRS would have been a MUCH better target.

Problem is those are already funded for this year, and no one thought up that option until just recently.


11 posted on 03/02/2015 5:55:42 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
It’s a two-step process. First budget (early in the year) then appropriations (late in the year)

Thanks. It seems to me the situation should be reversed, since appropriations are spending reality, and the budget is make-believe. But there I go applying logic to a government dominated by liberals.

12 posted on 03/02/2015 5:56:57 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Perhaps the GOPe doesn’t really want to win this one. I mean the Cromnibus doesn’t point to a change of heart, does it?


13 posted on 03/02/2015 6:00:16 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001
That's what I've been saying.

Strategically, what the GOP is doing makes little sense. The significance of the 2014 election is twofold -- not only did the Republicans win back the senate, but they also picked off enough "safe" Democrat senate seats in red states to make the Democrat pathway to regaining control difficult. Not impossible, but difficult. There are a lot of Republican seats up in 2016, but they are mostly in deep red states. Harry Reid won with 50.2% of the vote in 2010 and now has health issues, Colorado's Bennett won with 47.7% in 2010 before Colorado went full retard on gun control, and I think Carson could beat Mikulski in Maryland. Not all the Democrat seats are secure, IMO. And in the years following 2016 -- there are more red states than there are blue states.


14 posted on 03/02/2015 6:03:12 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Now your getting it. If they wanted to win, they would have attached the defunding to something like the EPA. Cruz said the fix was in from very beginning on this. This is just Washington Theatre.


15 posted on 03/02/2015 6:08:33 AM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bandleader
”Dingy Harry” would have already done away with it if the roles were reversed.

Mitch is old and doesn't care any more.

16 posted on 03/02/2015 6:10:01 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

McConnell would have to buy a box of depends first


17 posted on 03/02/2015 6:10:40 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

And a swinging pair too.

Maybe Jenner’s are available?


18 posted on 03/02/2015 6:14:15 AM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

I thought Mr. Reid did away with it.


19 posted on 03/02/2015 6:15:51 AM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mitchell001

Tell them to eliminate the filibuster rule so that a simple majority may pass the DHS appropriations bill.

Avoid saying “nuclear option”....

If you’re feeling your oats, remind them that the dems used this to govern as they wished - and that they passed 0bamacare with reconciliation.


20 posted on 03/02/2015 6:18:09 AM PST by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson