To: napscoordinator
That may be so but that is why Cruz needs to be Senate Majority Leader and let Walker be President. Walker is a blue collar get the job done. Cruz is an intellectual who can be the policy monk. Walkers speeches are less platitudes. Cruz can talk the conservative word and Walker will make sure they get done. I think it is a win-win for all involved.
No naps.
The POTUS chair demands the best leader. The one who is most fearless, the one GUARANTEED to fight the hardest for constitutional government, individual rights, smaller/limited government, and the social issues.
We need Ted Cruz as President.
CRUZ or LOSE!
17 posted on
03/01/2015 8:35:21 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Agreed. We can't allow a Walker v. Cruz split of the base because that will mean a Jeb nomination. Mobilize behind Cruz now.
20 posted on
03/01/2015 8:39:51 AM PST by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: SoConPubbie
I know what you are saying. But if you look at results only, Walker has been able to actually get them. Cruz has tried and tried hard but not a thing has been passed with his name on it. I would give him an A+ for effort. The thing with being President is being able to convince others of passing your agenda. Walker has been able to do this with Democrats and Republicans. Cruz is having difficulty getting the Republicans to side with his agenda much less the Democrats. That is a problem don’t you think?
23 posted on
03/01/2015 8:51:34 AM PST by
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson