“Fairly minor point, but you are confusing Hostage and myself. I never said anything at all about Apes.”
I already responded to Hostage about his Apes comment in Post 28, and then you jumped in to criticize my response to Hostage using the your Post 30 to say:
“I see you doing exactly the same thing. You prove absolutely nothing, but you spend an inordinate amount of time critiquing the vocabulary used by others. If we all just talked correctly, we would understand how solid the science of Evolution really is.”
Are you now asking us to believe you were not referring to Hostage’s “Apes” comment when you wrote: “critiquing the vocabulary used by others....”?
No one can have a rational conversation with you so long as you willfully choose to misuse such basic facts of natural history as the huge differences between the Apes you commented about and the proposed evolutionary common ancestor of Apes and Humans.
You clearly cite "the Apes you commented about". And you are not man enough to admit that Hostage commented on Apes and I commented on vocabulary. For you, a comment about "vocabulary" is the same thing as a comment about "apes".
For me, this sort of muddled thinking from you, using words in a very sloppy way to obfuscate your own points and then declare something along the lines of "I'm right; you're wrong" really sums you up nicely. It's pretty common among Evolutionists, which was my original point. It's just a political word game to press an agenda and has less to do with science than many assume.
I'm done.