No one can have a rational conversation with you so long as you willfully choose to misuse such basic facts of natural history as the huge differences between the Apes you commented about and the proposed evolutionary common ancestor of Apes and Humans.
You clearly cite "the Apes you commented about". And you are not man enough to admit that Hostage commented on Apes and I commented on vocabulary. For you, a comment about "vocabulary" is the same thing as a comment about "apes".
For me, this sort of muddled thinking from you, using words in a very sloppy way to obfuscate your own points and then declare something along the lines of "I'm right; you're wrong" really sums you up nicely. It's pretty common among Evolutionists, which was my original point. It's just a political word game to press an agenda and has less to do with science than many assume.
I'm done.
LOL, Hostage made the comment about the Apes, I commented about Hostage’s comment about the Apes, you chimed in with your comment about the vocabulary, which was about the Apes; and now you want to pretend your comment about my criticism of Hostage’s Apes vocabulary did not involve you misusing the vocabulary concerning the Apes which Hostage and I were discussing when you chimed in.... Yeah, right...we’re really going to believe that one. Then you have the gall to complain about “semantic obfuscation” and “just use a hodge-podge of made-up vocabulary....”
Now, I’ll restate the question for you. Do you or do you not mean to claim “Evolution” (meaning present day evolutionary theory) is wrong because it claims Humans are descended from Apes, as Hostage was commenting?