How Many Crimes Could Testing Rape Kits Prevent?

The Atlantic ^ | 02/24/2015 | David A. Graham

[1010RD]

Which political party lets this happen? They must be stopped. It’s a war on women!

[1010RD]

Race? Which party? What’s their politics? How do they view the world? That is the problem.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The party that has the dyke mayor using the power of government to go after Christian pastors.

[a fool in paradise]

Jails are already full. They wanted to tear down the old jail and build a new ‘cooler’ one (to go with the rest of their rebuilt downtown).

Locking up violent offenders is dangerous (when you apprehend them and every day while they are incarcerated). It costs money to lock them up. It costs money to pay for their legal defense.

They aren’t in the justice business, they are in the revenue business.

It was cheaper not to test all of the kits (if it was not necessary to prosecute the case for any of a variety of reason), cheaper to not prosecute all of the cases (even murderers are not brought to trial for all of their cases, live sentence or death penalty is enough to get them off the streets, at least until they seek to get their conviction thrown out).

Carjackings aren’t always prosecuted (even with violence, kidnapping, and photo IDs recovered).

[a fool in paradise]

Lesbian Mayor will still be sure to put this in her binder as she seeks higher office.

[jmacusa]

Anything .22 caliber and above is the best rape prevention kit there is.

[aft_lizard]

I dont think the statute of limitations matter once its been reported and evidence collected with in the original timeline. SoLs are for cases where for instance a woman claims she was raped ten years after the fact. I could be wrong.

[Does so]

I was thinking 38-Auto / 38-Super. If someone would measure the recoil spring cap diameter for me, I (we) could give a better answer.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I think that they have to issue a warrant before the statue of limitations is waived.