What if the Supreme Court rules against Obamacare?

Politico ^ | February 22, 2015 | By Kyle Cheney, Sarah Wheaton and Rachana Pradhan

[Jim Robinson]

The Supreme Court this June could cut off millions of Americans from affordable Obamacare coverage. The response from the nation’s governors gathering in Washington this week was an assortment of shrugs.

POLITICO interviewed more than a dozen governors, from both parties, this weekend at the National Governors Association winter meeting. Most said they’re in a wait-and-see zone. The Supreme Court will hear arguments next week, the decision is likely in late June and no one can foretell how the court will rule on its second major case that could strike at the heart of the president’s signature health law.

For some Republican governors it was a shrug of indifference. They say the onus falls on President Barack Obama and Congress to figure out what to do if the Supreme Court invalidates Affordable Care Act subsidies in their states. And if Obamacare falls apart, well, they say, good riddance.

For others — among them potential 2016 contenders Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio — it’s a shrug of uncertainty. Wisconsin’s own state health program for certain low-income people relies on the federal exchange, and Walker called for the feds to come up with at least a short-term fix. Kasich says he’s working on contingency plans to protect people in his state, but he hasn’t said what that would look like, or how he’d pay for it.

The Obamacare opponents behind King argue that subsidies are illegal in 34 states using HealthCare.gov instead of running their own insurance exchanges. A ruling against the White House could abruptly halt financial assistance to roughly seven million of the people who signed up through the federal exchange this year.

[Varsity Flight]

Isolated individual from help, raid “by night”, undercover.

The plan is actually quite insidious:

1. Force by law (bribed lawn), forced body mortgages on every citizen.

2. Leverage, at will (double the tax/penalty, then triple, while simultaneously increasing leveraged premiums. Forced teir levels. Premiums paying for “nothing” (ie. “out of thin air.”)

3. “Innocent” contact made (”checking”-inspection), to verify information (could be birthdate, place of employment, papers verifying type of body mortgage/Exchange-registration etc., (”insurance”).

4. Wrong tier/type of coverage (body-mortgage)”discovered.”

5. Tier “bumped”, assigned to another tier/exchange/higher level PENALty. #6

6. Back assets owed.#7

7. Pay or Asset REAL-estate seizure #8

8. Assets sold to _________ (bank-insurance/ and/or govt.)or new asset pool bought by other buyer(s), foreign or otherwise.

All actions above taken to isolated the individual, to avoid being noticed.

[NTHockey]

All are equal, but the half breed is more equal than all the others. (with apologies to George Orwell)

[GailA]

We are not on it either, but your doctor is doing the mining every time he types crap into his laptop computer.

We are Medicare and Tricare Life (Ret Military over 65 secondary to Medicare). So they know your entire health history at a key stroke. Our Co-pays just went up again.

And we make to much money to have hubby qualify for VA healthcare. What 2 SS checks and a Navy Pension? is to much money? $30K is the cut off. We just barely tip over it.

So he is going disability route. 20 yrs on a flight deck causes hearing loss, car wreck while on duty caused a bad knee, and loss of teeth. Why they did not do full dentures when it happened is DUMB. He only had 5 teeth left after the wreck. Would have been better off pulling them and doing full dentures, instead of convoluted plates. Lowers were totally gone so it got a full denture.

Now they are data mining your FB including your PM messages.

Have you noticed if you look up a item, it will show up in a add on the next web site you go to? Only exception are undies and porn. Every time I look up a drug, it shows up on the next web site I look at.

FR is not included.