To: E. Pluribus Unum
““The proposal would not authorize the government to undertake any search or seizure or use any remote search technique not already permitted under current law.”
That’s BS. Why do they need a rule change that doesn’t change anything?
3 posted on
02/21/2015 7:42:16 PM PST by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Same reason Obola needs a new immigration law when he doesn’t even enforce the existing one.
4 posted on
02/21/2015 7:43:09 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Probably about greasing the way past safeguards
12 posted on
02/21/2015 8:24:35 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson