Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why do so many people disbelieve every scientific body in the world and every climate scientist publishing in peer-reviewed science journals (where real scientists show their work and express their ideas)?

Like the Phil Jones "My dog ate all the raw data" excuse? Or Mann's hockey stick graph whose methodology would take random data and give it a hockey stick shape 99% of the time?

Peer review in many cases has turned into a case of the Emperor's New Clothes where the one who complements the emperor's clothing the most gets the most federal grants.

32 posted on 02/21/2015 6:26:22 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Peer review works only when the peers are committed to absolute truth. Otherwise it is a cabal feedback mechanism.


34 posted on 02/21/2015 6:28:04 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
Oops. Left off my link to the analysis of Mann's hockey stick.

http://a-sceptical-mind.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-hockey-stick

35 posted on 02/21/2015 6:28:55 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson