Los Angeles Police Union Backs Anti-Gun Harris For Senate

gunalizer.com ^ | 2/15/2015 | RRangel

[rktman]

The Los Angeles Police Protective League, supports rabidly anti-gun attorney general Kamala Harris, for Barbara Boxer’s senate seat. The union says she supports law enforcement and it’s true.

[rktman]

WHAT? A union supporting a left wing radical extremist constitution hating liberal IPOS to take boxcars place? Looks like a shoe in to me.

[duffee]

Did they poll their members? was it a selective poll?

[Regulator]

Because of Affirmative Action for America Haters, the LAPD is now 44% “hispanic”, whatever that means.

People like that think its perfectly OK for the State AG to refuse to defend the state Constitution that she swore to uphold because hey, thats the way it goes down in their countries.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Police unions are as bad as any other union, if not worse.

Many have direct ties to SEIU.

[Pollster1]

Article. VI . . . This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

This evil woman perhaps supports selective law enforcement - a corrupt society of connections and pull, in which insiders automatically win and the deck is stacked against ordinary, decent people, but she does not support the rule of law. She reminds me of Jefferson's warnings about the Tree of Liberty, a quote that is disturbingly timely in these terrible days that America is facing.

[rktman]

A lot of folks don’t seem to catch the “treaties” portion of Article VI. Be wary my friends. Be very wary. (Try not to sound like elmer fudd when saying that.)

[eyeamok]

And why exactly should citizens have any respect for police?

[556x45]

Thats easy...they have guns, numbers and unlimited govt ‘authority’ to kick in your door and murder you.

[Pollster1]

A lot of folks don’t seem to catch the “treaties” portion of Article VI. Be wary my friends. Be very wary. (Try not to sound like elmer fudd when saying that.)

A sensible person would argue (correctly) both that order matters, so that the Constitution takes precedence over treaties in case of a conflict, and that treaties made outside the Authority of the United States are explicitly excluded by the qualifier "Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States". The problem is that many who want power will pretend those issues do not matter, and we cannot trust even the Supreme Court to protect the Constitution.

[drpix]

And predicatably, along with her anti-Second Amendment attitude is a leftwing radical anti-Law Enforcement attitude - that seems to matter little to the leftist-party-faithful who have taken over a police union. Here's what she said as San Francisco DA:

"Let's also talk about creating a campaign around reducing not the crime but the fear of crime...Let's talk about that. If we, as a goal, decide that we want more people to just stop being afraid, because they're perhaps afraid of much more than they have reason to be afraid of, perhaps we can start to change the discussion about what we need to do about fear because we won't have so many people worried about the bogeyman."

Source/Link

Yes, the leftwing radical that was San Francisco's DA and California's & Jerry Brown's AG thinks that Law Enforcement's job should not be reducing crime but reducing the fear of crime! And fraudulent Police Union officials support her!

[rktman]

And with the lyin’ kings take on this, all he needs is his signature to commence implementing, well, anything he wants with or without senate approval/RATification. It’s good to be the king. I guess.

[DPMD]

Think “pensions.”