Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler

Why were the Marines not on a military flight with F-18s overhead?

A commercial flight?

Why not a charter at least?

Chesty Puller is restless right now.


39 posted on 02/12/2015 12:26:09 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exit82

The original reports referred to it as a “contracted” plane. Then it became a “commercial” or “civilian” plane. IMO, the reference changed inorder to explain the decision to disarm the Marines. Does anyone really believe US Marines extracted from a US embassy under emergency conditions were put on a commercial airliner with civilian passengers, leaving a chaotic hot spot in the ME? Commercial or civilian terminology simply means it was NOT a US military aircraft, government owned. I am betting the only people on that plane were US military and other embassy assets.


44 posted on 02/12/2015 12:56:28 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson