Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems on FEC open to new regs on donors, Internet
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 2/11/15 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 02/11/2015 9:09:55 AM PST by ColdOne

Claiming that thousands of public comments condemning “dark money” in politics can’t be ignored, the Democrat-chaired Federal Election Commission on Wednesday appeared ready to open the door to new regulations on donors, bloggers and others who use the Internet to influence policy and campaigns.

During a broad FEC hearing to discuss a recent Supreme Court decision that eliminated some donor limits, proponents encouraged the agency to draw up new funding disclosure rules and require even third-party internet-based groups to reveal donors, a move that would extinguish a 2006 decision to keep the agency’s hands off the Internet.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2015 9:09:55 AM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Trying to get this one to the USSC.


2 posted on 02/11/2015 9:15:09 AM PST by Biggirl (2014 MIdterms Were BOTH A Giant Wave And Restraining Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

They will have full control of these nets by the time he is out of office I think. They cannot have us getting the real info and spreading it as well. :(


3 posted on 02/11/2015 9:18:24 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Court smack down in 3.. 2.. 1..

Be nice if it was accompanied by a nice contempt of court charge.


4 posted on 02/11/2015 9:18:57 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

That is why I suspect this will land up in the USSC’s lap.


5 posted on 02/11/2015 9:19:10 AM PST by Biggirl (2014 MIdterms Were BOTH A Giant Wave And Restraining Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Now a days, that isn’t a happy thought.


6 posted on 02/11/2015 9:29:48 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingu

They are really touching a third rail here. This, the regulation of websites, is something that a public-schooled younger person can understand - and fight against.


7 posted on 02/11/2015 9:29:49 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The internet is driving them nuts, and they’ve got to get it under their control.


8 posted on 02/11/2015 9:33:43 AM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

SCOTUS ain’t gonna do squat.
They already showed their hand on homo marriage


9 posted on 02/11/2015 9:35:18 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Aww, heck, if the rumored ideas are right, Jim would be required to submit every donors full name and occupation. Sure that liberal playgrounds like DailyKos and D’Underground would be exempt.


10 posted on 02/11/2015 9:37:22 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Well I do not know about that. Was there not a campaign money case a few years back and that decision looked very conservative.


11 posted on 02/11/2015 9:40:02 AM PST by Biggirl (2014 MIdterms Were BOTH A Giant Wave And Restraining Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Well, then, I’m a free-lance fehdreher, and live in Heinlein Dome on Luna. . . .


12 posted on 02/11/2015 9:44:33 AM PST by Salgak (Peace through Superior Firepower. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu

When I donate money to a political action group, that money is used to sway public opinion on forums that the consumer cannot control, like a tv commercial.
Political internet web sites ( like FR) do not force themselves on people. You have to seek them out by a web search.
This sounds very unconstitutional.


13 posted on 02/11/2015 9:47:33 AM PST by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

If this tyrannical gov’t continues to have their way; Gitmo will be emptied of islamic terrorists and filled with U.S. citizens deemed Blog enemies of the State and housed as political prisoners absent rights or any legal recourse.


14 posted on 02/11/2015 9:50:12 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Only the spilling of blood is going to stop the onslaught I’m afraid. Their incessant march on freedom and removal of protections is getting way beyond tiring and agitation.


15 posted on 02/11/2015 9:55:28 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I recall years ago the cockiness of the Clinton crowd as they ballyhooed how they would control the conversation with regards to the internet. Today the left is running scared, and dangerous as they fight to push their message.


16 posted on 02/11/2015 9:58:22 AM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I have a feeling some particularly personal nasty details of the actors involved is about to come out on the Internet soon the closer they get to setting up Operation Net BiasControl. I think they are already setting up the pieces to make it operational without getting the goahead. I think they will implement it and just not tell anyone even though they’ll start noticing changes pretty soon. Thats just the way these guys rolll. They don’t need no stinkin permission!


17 posted on 02/11/2015 10:01:08 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
IN the abstract I have no issue with reveling all donors that contribute to organizations that advocate for a particular party or candidate.

Am I missing something?

18 posted on 02/11/2015 10:17:08 AM PST by Mariner (First the GOP must die. Everything else comes after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Am I missing something?

Jerks who will use the information to ruin your life.

19 posted on 02/11/2015 10:25:21 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Probably not, since FR is an LLC and not a 501c3 or 4.


20 posted on 02/11/2015 10:32:07 AM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson