>> I have seen no mention of Darwin in any article — using science in general is just abusing science in general.
“Darwin Day” is used. It is because Darwin’s birthday seems to be the equivalent of Christmas in the new religion of Scientism. It is used by the adherents to celebrate their fight against heretics and blasphemers.
Science is good, like all tools used by mankind are good. Science is bad the exact same way. Just like hammers, guns, electricity, computers, or any other thing we make use of. We are bad or good, not the tools.
>> The “but especially Darwinism (whatever the heck that is, since there is no such thing in science)” is just sophistry.
You sound like a worshipper. Like the Muslims, you accuse the heretics of misnaming your God, when the supposed misnomer is used among the priesthood freely, but initiates are told to punish the unbelievers with accusations that they besmirch the divine.
When you do an online search on the journal “Nature”, you get 376 articles mentioning “Darwinism”.
http://search.nature.com/search/?sp_a=sp1001702d&sp_t=advanced&sp_x_1=ujournal&sp-p=all&sp
Online search of “Science” journal, 44 hits.
http://www.sciencemag.org/search.dtl
Online search of “PubMed” journal, 193 hits.
http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed
Why do you spout neoMarxist untruths on a conservative website?
>>“Darwin Day” is used. It is because Darwin’s birthday seems to be the equivalent of Christmas in the new religion of Scientism. <<
It is? Or the author asserts it is? You seem to enjoy begging the question.
>>You sound like a worshipper. Like the Muslims, you accuse the heretics of misnaming your God<<
Talk about ad hominem. You don’t understand TToE so you slam the man who first glimpsed it. It is you who is like the Church who attacked Copernicus for not hewing to religious dogma.
I understand science and TToE. The author grabs Darwin randomly as his deus ex machina to hang all science-related ills.
>>(various searches)<<
In every instance I could pull up, “Darwinism” is used colloquially — not as a scientific principle.
>>Why do you spout neoMarxist untruths on a conservative website?<<
Why do you use ad hominem on a conservative website? The fact you don’t understand science does not mean those who do are “neoMaxists” or whatever other epithet you generate.