>>“Darwin Day” is used. It is because Darwin’s birthday seems to be the equivalent of Christmas in the new religion of Scientism. <<
It is? Or the author asserts it is? You seem to enjoy begging the question.
>>You sound like a worshipper. Like the Muslims, you accuse the heretics of misnaming your God<<
Talk about ad hominem. You don’t understand TToE so you slam the man who first glimpsed it. It is you who is like the Church who attacked Copernicus for not hewing to religious dogma.
I understand science and TToE. The author grabs Darwin randomly as his deus ex machina to hang all science-related ills.
>>(various searches)<<
In every instance I could pull up, “Darwinism” is used colloquially — not as a scientific principle.
>>Why do you spout neoMarxist untruths on a conservative website?<<
Why do you use ad hominem on a conservative website? The fact you don’t understand science does not mean those who do are “neoMaxists” or whatever other epithet you generate.
“I understand science and TToE.”
That’s clearly not true.