Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr; Rebel_Ace
Yes, "Everywhere". Your argument sprouts from the assumption that there is something to be found.

AGW alarmists assert that there is "something there" when the evidence doesn't support that conclusion. Are you also asserting that there's something there with no evidence to support you?

As to R_A's wallet; it's a silly argument. No. Looking in your wallet and assuming wouldn't be the correct analogue...

Looking everywhere that is accessible within your yard and on your property, and then declaring that there's no one there prior to digging up the soil and sawing all of the trees in half, is a more apt comparison..
9 posted on 02/09/2015 7:46:37 AM PST by Hugh the Scot ( Total War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Hugh the Scot
AGW alarmists assert that there is "something there" when the evidence doesn't support that conclusion. Are you also asserting that there's something there with no evidence to support you?

No. It's about evidence. At what point do you declare "I've looked at all the evidence". Claiming that there "nothing there" because there is no evidence he can see beyond our solar system derives the finding that there is nothing to be found in the entire Universe is childish at best.

12 posted on 02/09/2015 7:51:48 AM PST by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Hugh the Scot
"...As to R_A's wallet; it's a silly argument. No. Looking in your wallet and assuming wouldn't be the correct analogue...
Looking everywhere that is accessible within your yard and on your property, and then declaring that there's no one there prior to digging up the soil and sawing all of the trees in half, is a more apt comparison..."


With all due respect, you are in error. Let me lay out the analogy for you, so that you understand the relevant portions:

Question: Is there someone there? Essentially the same in my example and of life in the Universe.

Area under consideration: The Universe in the article, my entire property in my analogy. In my Analogy, My Yard and property = The Universe.

Area having been searched by ACTUAL INSPECTION: Our Solar System in the Article, My Wallet's Card Holder in my Analogy. So, in my Analogy, My Wallet's Card Holder = Our Solar System.

I will grant you that my analogy is off in only this respect: My Wallet's Card Holder is a FAR GREATER SAMPLE within my property than Our Solar System is in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE.

I hope that clears that up for you.
25 posted on 02/09/2015 9:01:43 AM PST by Rebel_Ace (My wife told me to update my tag, so I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson