Here’s the article about Jeb’s high school years — https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/02/01/tumultuous-four-years-phillips-academy-helped-shape-jeb-bush/q6ccyHNOtP1n6kqDokMBfK/story.html
One idiot accusing another idiot of idiocy ... how idiotic.
Geez, no Libertarian in THAT guy, huh?
Top priority stuff Rand /s
Rand Paul is such an immature punk.
The “Liberal Party” in action.
And Rand comes out swinging early in an effort to pull democrat voters away from Jeb!
Sorry Rand, but a Pothead Coalition can’t get you to the White House. Most of your voters will be too stoned to get to the polls.
dWARf on drugs
Who is John Galt? Well, it is not Rand Paul, even though he is the author’s namesake.
Entertaining but that’s about it.
Rand, your dad is proof that drugs kill brain cells.
Note that Jeb’s pro-amnesty stance is not being challenged by Paul. That’s more serious than what Bush smoked as a teenager.
I guess Rand doesn’t believe that those who have tried drugs and seen/experienced the ill effects, should have an opinion on whether or not drugs are good for you...the drugs have a right to be legalized.
Why is it hypocrisy to recognize that one’s behavior - especially previous behavior - is or was wrong and refuse to accept one’s bad behavior as good?
Paul and his mindless followers can slam Bush all they want LOL..I wont vote for either Bush or Paul!
‘DALLAS — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Jeb Bush of hypocrisy after The Boston Globe reported the former Florida governor was a heavy marijuana smoker while at an elite prep school.’
Rand certainly could make some sense if only Bush still kept smoking.
A fact that he is not anymore actually gives Jeb some credibility on a subject. Where is a hypocrisy?
Yeah, because we can’t possibly learn anything after high school. What an idiot.
the real hypocrisy is how the media will "report" this. I'll bet farm that they will say things like, " our leader can't be a former drug user", yet with pictures of the current resident of the White House, they issue a pass and play it off as "no big deal". Yet when this happens the right just gets a dear in the headlights look on their face and says nothing - thus giving the press more power to do such things.
So many things to attack Jebbie on in the first debate. So little time. :-)