Posted on 01/27/2015 10:07:05 PM PST by Nachum
Former Secretary of State and likely 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has agreed to testify before the House Select Committee on the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi.
Reportedly, she was first contacted in that regard by the committee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings.
According to reports, neither Clinton nor a spokesperson on her behalf has commented on her pending appearance.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I think you are correct.
For those who have hope, odds are on disappointment.
The setup was to not get subpoenaed, but quickly announce through democratic operatives on the committee that she’s volunteering.
They should issue a subpoena just for the record though.
“Do you recall that while testifying before congressional investigators as first lady, she answered “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” 250 times?”
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/06/hillary_clintons_legacy_of_scandal.html
As long as the vile harridan is under oath. She has told so many lies she will trip up somewhere
I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re right. I could also see some far left Warren supporters making sure it goes south for Hillary. The perjury charge wouldn’t be filled though.
Keep count of the number of times Hillary answers with “I can’t recall”.
Hillary lies whether under oath or not. Remember Hillary can do no wrong - it’s one of the privileges of royalty.
I'm sorry, I can't recall..I'msorryIcan'trecall.....I'm......sorry......I......can't ...........recall. I'm sorry I can't recall..I was home baking cookies for my daughter.......What difference does it make?...I'm sorry I can't recall....I'msorryIcan'trecall...I'm ........sorry........I.......can't......recall..I was at home baking coookies for my daughter.............(repeat 250+times).
How many “I can’t remember— don’t recall “ will she be able to fit into her fifteen minutes
She’s too fat, wrinkled and ugly to pull off another “Pretty in Pink” interview. She’ll resort to “I can’t recall” or “I don’t believe you can prove that....”, just plain lie and dare anyone to prove otherwise. She wouldn’t be appearing if there were any paper out there on her.
It’s what she does.
at this point I fail to trust Gowdy or any damned politico in D.C.
What difference does it make? Ah iz annointed , ordained and queen of the hill!
( If Pillory is elected, she will be much worse that the current America hater in the White Hut......a hateful dyke for president? The presider of debacles? May God help America.)
“I can’t remember, my brain’s in a blender, it’s Jell-O....”
I believe she will actually say quite a bit. Not much of it will be true.
Either that or we will get a lot of “I don’t recall”
Ebola? Black Plague? West Nile Virus? Swine Flu?
Well, she is a swine and a plague on us.
The other outcome is that the 'Pubs play their usual meek, mild, deferential role, they don't ask any tough questions, don't press home any issues, and she comes off looking like she is helpful, cooperative, and innocent. Then she gets to frame the issue on her terms, which is always the key in politics. The 'Rats will say, see, Hillary has nothing to hide, the mean 'Pubs got nothing on her, let's "move on". Sound familiar? It should. We had eight long, weary, dreary years of it in the '90s.
Didn’t Gowdy say that witnesses would have no choice in the matter? So she is announcing this to make it appear like it is her choice.
What BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.