Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2015 11:25:31 AM PST by jimluke01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jimluke01

“Like a plastic Piggly Wiggly bag fluttering about in the alley”

Submitted for the worst opening line of an op-ed piece.


2 posted on 01/17/2015 11:33:20 AM PST by Usagi_yo (It's not possible to give success. Only opportunity. Success is earned on it's own right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Kutner is guilty.....WAAAAAAAAAAY guilty.


3 posted on 01/17/2015 11:37:10 AM PST by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

INCEST: The path to Sodom Destruction of the Nation.


4 posted on 01/17/2015 11:38:00 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Personally, I think the pedophiles have a better argument to be next; although there is a ring to the incest argument about it being genetic, so to speak.


5 posted on 01/17/2015 11:41:09 AM PST by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

America needs more people with two left hands and feet.


7 posted on 01/17/2015 11:48:34 AM PST by Stepan12 (Our present appeasement of Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Bookmark


11 posted on 01/17/2015 12:11:47 PM PST by publius911 (Formerly Publius6961)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Well, we’d only being catching up with Europe.

Napoleon himself abolished laws against incest.

Unfortunately, since the idea of marriage being all about families and children is rejected, there’s no reason to ban anything that was taboo anymore.

God help us all.


14 posted on 01/17/2015 12:19:53 PM PST by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01; SandRat; ClearCase_guy
"... the greasy slope made slippery by the advent of counterfeit “same-sex marriage.” If you artificially remove one requirement for marriage – in this case, the binary male-female prerequisite – then there is no justification, logically or legally, for not removing all requirements."

True. But the slope got pretty dang slippery before same-sex "marriage."

What are the requirements for real marriage?

If "marriage" is a three-legged stool, then it was already smashed flat to the ground when "straight" people

So it was straight people who denatured and perverted sex, and re-defined marriage. No wonder the gays want in now: it suits them.


Oh, and I would agree that marriage, properly defined, involves more than just this "three-legged stool." But these are basics; and if you take these three defining characteristics away, you don't actually have marriage. You have a deconstructed pile of parts and splinters.

15 posted on 01/17/2015 12:23:36 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To those who insisted that homosexual marriage wouldn't lead to this: "WE TOLD YOU SO."
16 posted on 01/17/2015 12:24:43 PM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Well, I don’t care what they do with the law, I don’t believe I could know that my neighbor was screwing his minor daughter and not do something forceful to stop it.

I guess by the time the pervs get all this sort of sick behavior legalized close minded old farts like me will be dead and no one will object.

People like this woman at salon are disgusting beyond belief.


17 posted on 01/17/2015 12:35:12 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01
If you artificially remove one requirement for marriage – in this case, the binary male-female prerequisite – then there is no justification, logically or legally, for not removing all requirements.

Sorry, but this implies the collapse of the moral foundation started with the gay marriage bit.

Which is of course nonsense. It started with the general acceptance of premarital sex. The second brick to go was easy divorce.

Once you abandon the ideal of sex limited to marriage, there is no logical stopping point short of the "anything goes" for consenting adults point we're at now.

I think we'll stick with the consensual part, but I expect the "adults" part to start eroding soon.

The problem is that most people were more than happy to accept the removal of the first brick, since it provided justification for something most of us are inclined to do anyway, and now we're on the slippery slope and accelerating towards the bottom. To scramble metaphors.

18 posted on 01/17/2015 12:52:17 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Deliverance 2: The rebirth of the Democrat Party
At a theater near you.


24 posted on 01/17/2015 3:47:19 PM PST by wvguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

If I want to marry my dog, that’s my constitutional right.

And what about necrophiles? Why on earth can’t you marry your dead lover?

Really, why stop at incest?


29 posted on 01/17/2015 4:33:45 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01
And the CHILDREN born of incest? What about them?

Generations of incest didn't do much for the health or sanity of ancient Egyptian, Hapsburg dynasty, ancient Hawaiian, Persian, or Peruvian rulers, did it?

30 posted on 01/17/2015 5:45:17 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jimluke01

Why not allow incest?

Like what book of morals are the left going to cite to say that it is a bad thing?


39 posted on 01/18/2015 10:09:12 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson