Posted on 01/17/2015 11:25:31 AM PST by jimluke01
Like a plastic Piggly Wiggly bag fluttering about in the alley, those untethered from God’s natural law are violently tossed to and fro by the gusting winds of moral relativism. Jenny Kutner is one such Piggly Wiggly bag. A 20-something assistant editor at Salon.com, she describes herself as “focusing on sex, gender and feminism.”
By “focusing on sex, gender and feminism,” and as you will soon see, this young “progressive” means to say that she spends her days rationalizing each and every conceivable form of sexual deviancy, as well as trying to otherwise deconstruct that which she and her fellow feminist travelers view as an artificially constructed culture of “heteronormativity” – the sinister brainchild of the evil-man-led global patriarchy (for those interested, we meet Tuesdays at noon at the Golden Corral on Wards Road). Along with a growing number of secular leftists, Kutner’s latest sexual taboo for de-stigmatization is incest.
Those of us defending the institution of legitimate marriage and fighting to preserve respect for sexual morality in our culture have long warned of the greasy slope made slippery by the advent of counterfeit “same-sex marriage.” If you artificially remove one requirement for marriage – in this case, the binary male-female prerequisite – then there is no justification, logically or legally, for not removing all requirements. If we yank one foundational brick from the marriage wall, then, as in the days of Jericho, the whole danged thing comes a-tumblin’. That is to say, in the wake of America’s burgeoning “gay marriage” tsunami, we can soon expect to dog-paddle the ensuing sewage of legalized polygamy, incestuous marriage and heaven-knows-what-else.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Like a plastic Piggly Wiggly bag fluttering about in the alley”
Submitted for the worst opening line of an op-ed piece.
Kutner is guilty.....WAAAAAAAAAAY guilty.
INCEST: The path to Sodom Destruction of the Nation.
Personally, I think the pedophiles have a better argument to be next; although there is a ring to the incest argument about it being genetic, so to speak.
It was a dark and stormy night. Like a plastic Piggly Wiggly bag fluttering about in the alley, my girlfriend’s final words echoed in my ears: “Let’s see if the lion is asleep”.
America needs more people with two left hands and feet.
I’m all for the legalization of incestuous marraige. I can marry my son and beat the death tax.
Huh??
Don’t go all Piggly Wiggly plasticy baggity on us.
Bookmark
seems like the perfect opening sentence for this piece, describing how people think who have no moral foundation
Well, we’d only being catching up with Europe.
Napoleon himself abolished laws against incest.
Unfortunately, since the idea of marriage being all about families and children is rejected, there’s no reason to ban anything that was taboo anymore.
God help us all.
True. But the slope got pretty dang slippery before same-sex "marriage."
What are the requirements for real marriage?
If "marriage" is a three-legged stool, then it was already smashed flat to the ground when "straight" people
So it was straight people who denatured and perverted sex, and re-defined marriage. No wonder the gays want in now: it suits them.
Oh, and I would agree that marriage, properly defined, involves more than just this "three-legged stool." But these are basics; and if you take these three defining characteristics away, you don't actually have marriage. You have a deconstructed pile of parts and splinters.
Well, I don’t care what they do with the law, I don’t believe I could know that my neighbor was screwing his minor daughter and not do something forceful to stop it.
I guess by the time the pervs get all this sort of sick behavior legalized close minded old farts like me will be dead and no one will object.
People like this woman at salon are disgusting beyond belief.
Sorry, but this implies the collapse of the moral foundation started with the gay marriage bit.
Which is of course nonsense. It started with the general acceptance of premarital sex. The second brick to go was easy divorce.
Once you abandon the ideal of sex limited to marriage, there is no logical stopping point short of the "anything goes" for consenting adults point we're at now.
I think we'll stick with the consensual part, but I expect the "adults" part to start eroding soon.
The problem is that most people were more than happy to accept the removal of the first brick, since it provided justification for something most of us are inclined to do anyway, and now we're on the slippery slope and accelerating towards the bottom. To scramble metaphors.
They knew. It’s part of the long-term plan; which they will continue to deny.
Yeah they knew.
We even had a few in forum trolling over it at the time.
The smirking butt sniffers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.