Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A jury acquitted him.
1 posted on 01/16/2015 6:08:45 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; Salamander; ...
JBT Ping list


2 posted on 01/16/2015 6:09:42 AM PST by null and void (The aggregate effect of competitive capitalism is indistinguishable from magic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

A Connecticut police officer was found not guilty Wednesday of violating the civil rights of a man...


Good.

Next time you might want to charge him with battery.


3 posted on 01/16/2015 6:13:01 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Maybe he had a poisonous spider on him and the nice officer was killing the spider.


5 posted on 01/16/2015 6:19:47 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Thank those knuckleheads and black racists in Ferguson and other places for switching the focus from genuine instances if police brutality lIke this one to unfounded outrage as in Ferguson. But my suspicion is that a lot more if this goes on in white and black and Hispanic communities than is reported.

Unfortunately jurors are frequently people who are not as informed and politically educated as the individuals on this forum. They are charged by the judge, intimidated by the Prosecutor and flim-flamed by the cops.

They are out of contool and, unfortunately, Muslim terrorism confuses the issue as the public wants protection.


7 posted on 01/16/2015 6:26:13 AM PST by ZULU (Je Suis Charlie. . GET IT OBAMA, OR DON'T YOU??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

So... What was the result of the internal affairs investigation?


8 posted on 01/16/2015 6:28:28 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
A jury acquitted him.

End of story.
10 posted on 01/16/2015 6:30:54 AM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

So. Where’s the video. The link only shows a still shot.


11 posted on 01/16/2015 6:32:03 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Clive is the negro officer.
He only got in one kick I saw in the video.


15 posted on 01/16/2015 6:39:06 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I thought the rule of thumb was three blows. That after a suspect stopped resisting any officer that struck them more than three times was guilty of assault themselves. I guess the idea behind the three is to give the officers a chance to notice the perp has stopped resisting. I honestly don’t remember where I heard/read that though.


25 posted on 01/16/2015 6:51:01 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Consider that incident in light of the possibility of gun confiscation in Connecticut, and connect the dots between cops being allowed to stomp on someone at will, and disarming the public.


32 posted on 01/16/2015 7:00:33 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

What part of “found NOT GUILTY of police brutality” do you not understand. Were you on the jury?


37 posted on 01/16/2015 7:06:30 AM PST by McGruff (We have met the enemy and they are our own party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

jury nullification?
it was fine for OJ....


40 posted on 01/16/2015 7:16:49 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Do you realize this headline is false?
The two officers that “repeatedly stomped suspect “ were not on trial.


45 posted on 01/16/2015 7:31:43 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I don’t know anything about this blogger, but I am curious about why he chose a still from the vid that makes the stomper look white.

The link to the “Dail Mail” story that someone postedhere shows a photo of Higgins that clearly shows he is black.

(This is not a funny situation, but I have to admit that I giggled when I read under said photo the caption, which ended with “...he violated a man’s civil rights by helping to beat him with two other officers as he lay tasered and face down on the ground in 2011”. He looks like a powerful guy, but I wonder how he beat the guy by using 2 officers.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2911005/Connecticut-cop-caught-camera-repeatedly-stomped-tasered-man-NOT-GUILTY-brutality.html#ixzz3OzyRuw7L


46 posted on 01/16/2015 7:32:46 AM PST by Bigg Red (Congress, do your duty and repo his pen and his phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; All
I read the article from the UK. Although it doesn't say specifically what type of jury acquitted him, my bet is the DA ran the case past a Grand Jury where only a majority of the jurors is needed to “No bill” a case rather than a unanimous decision of a regular criminal trial.

From my experience of sitting on a San Francisco Grand Jury that handled among others police brutality cases the DA’s office routinely assigned the most green, inexperienced and incompetent ADA’s to police brutality cases. In the case I sat on there were 2 ADA’s present. The clutzy inexperienced one did the presentation while the second one sat in the back of the room taking notes.

When it came to give final summation ADA #1 made his summation then ADA #2 made a summation that essentially was 180 degrees counter to the first ADA summation. We were surprised and confused so no indictment was delivered. All it took was for a majority of jurors to say no.

The DA’s office also stretched the case out for months making it hard to keep facts straight in your mind. That's how it can be done to have the most egregious cases of brutality go away.

53 posted on 01/16/2015 9:36:52 AM PST by Polynikes (What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Officer Joe Peterson, is that you?

“I give my left nut to bang down your door and come for your gun”, *that* Connecticut cop.,

54 posted on 01/16/2015 9:38:28 AM PST by Daffynition ("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Not surprising.


61 posted on 01/16/2015 6:23:10 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson