Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are you ready for…President Lindsey Graham?
Hotair ^ | 01/15/2015 | Guy Benson

Posted on 01/15/2015 8:42:19 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Have you felt the burgeoning public groundswell for a 2016 Lindsey Graham presidential bid? You haven’t? Well, Lindsey Graham has:

“I’m not doing it to make a statement. I’m doing it to change the country and offer what I have to offer to the American people, and to my party. And I think I’m uniquely qualified to deal with the threats we’re talking about. So when I hear a United States Senator trying to rationalize that Iraq created the problems in France, and when I hear some libertarians on my side of the aisle associated with the Republican Party say that it is our interventionist policy that has brought people down on us, they don’t know what they’re talking about. When I hear the president of the United States and his chief spokesperson failing to admit that we’re in a religious war, it really bothers me. And I want to be somebody who can talk about the world as it really is.”

And that “somebody,” presumably, is himself. Don’t laugh. He has a heavy duty supporter, beloved by the base, cheering him on:

My illegitimate son Lindsey Graham is exploring that option,” two-time presidential candidate [Sen. John McCain] said, prompting laughter from reporters during a press conference on the prison at Guantanamo Bay. “So I am strongly encouraging Sen. Lindsey Graham, particularly with the world the way it is today. No one understands the world today in the way that Lindsey Graham does, in my view.”

McCain’s Illegitimate Son For President! Feel the excitement! Graham, needless to say, is not a favorite among grassroots conservatives, a point we’ll explore further in a moment. First, it’s worth noting that he worked awfully hard to stave off any serious primary challenge in his Senate race last year, waltzing to re-election in a very conservative state. Not an easy feat for a pol in his position. (Let the record reflect that Sen. Tim Scott won by an even larger margin). And it’d be ungenerous not to concede that Graham sometimes does excellent work from his Senate perch; his brutal cross-examination of Chuck Hagel, steadfast opposition to President Obama’s Guantanamo Bay policy, and tenacity on Benghazi come to mind. That said, in what possible universe does he think he’d mount a viable presidential candidacy, especially amid a crowded, talented field? Graham told Hugh Hewitt he’s weighing his options and seeking a “credible” and “competitive” way forward. If such a path exists, I just don’t see it. The supposed raison d’etre for his participation would be to go to bat for the hawkish wing of the party on foreign policy and national security issues, which might make some sense if the emerging field featured a strong anti-interventionist streak. But it doesn’t. Basically everyone in the mix not named “Rand Paul” will be running on a muscular foreign policy platform. If and when Sen. Paul serves up a “let’s mind our own business and not invite blowback” debate answer, virtually everyone on stage will be champing at the bit to push back. Marco Rubio and Chris Christie have already traded overt barbs with Paul on these matters, and part of me thinks that John Bolton’s potential candidacy would be launched with the primary purpose of aggressively confronting the Paul wing of the party in nationally-televised forums. The fact is that Lindsey Graham’s foreign policy worldview will enjpy ample representation among Republican 2016 contenders. In order to justify throwing his hat into the ring, Graham would have to conclude that he’s better equipped to defend that element of his platform than anyone else — which is what his “uniquely qualified” remark may have been alluding to.

Some Righties may be tempted to go nuclear on “Grahamnesty’s” prospective entry into the race in hopes of scaring him off, but they’d be well advised to keep this instinct in check. If establishment-leaning primary voters end up being forced to choose from among a wide array of center-right options (Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney and Chris Christie and Lindsey Graham and, um, George Pataki), that heavily diffused voting bloc may present the right flank of the GOP electorate with a golden opening to coalesce around a more conservative alternative (if not a Ted Cruz or Bobby Jindal, perhaps a “consensus conservative” like Rubio or Scott Walker). Hell, Tea Partiers might even consider printing up ‘Grahamania!’ t-shirts and inundating the Senator’s office with warm words of encouragement. Be the heretofore nonexistent groundswell, guys. And while we’re on the subject of 2016, I’ll leave you with a growing list of possible contenders who’ve already lined up to cast Romney as old news, with varying degrees of deference: Graham, Walker, Paul, Jeb (via supporters), and counting…


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; lindseygraham; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Olog-hai

Not going into ancient history...We be in USA 2015. It’s a queer name from spoiled brat queer town.


21 posted on 01/15/2015 8:57:35 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

I’m just kidding of course...not.


22 posted on 01/15/2015 8:58:58 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So there might be two women running for president?


23 posted on 01/15/2015 9:02:36 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

24 posted on 01/15/2015 9:04:33 PM PST by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

SC people will be saying: “we tried to tell you how great our senior senator is.”


25 posted on 01/15/2015 9:05:03 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

First gay president?


26 posted on 01/15/2015 9:12:41 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
No one understands the world today in the way that Lindsey Graham does, in my view.

'Round these parts that's what they say just before they lock someone up in a padded room.

27 posted on 01/15/2015 9:16:05 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The more RINO’s the better. Let them split up the mushy moderate/liberal vote. I want a conservative to win.


28 posted on 01/15/2015 9:24:48 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Graham should run for President to add another RINO to the mix, and so that South Carolina can finally elect 2 conservative Senators.


29 posted on 01/15/2015 9:25:42 PM PST by JSDude1 ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Graham is nominated, we will have two women on ballot in November 2016 for president!


30 posted on 01/15/2015 9:35:42 PM PST by entropy12 (Dumb and Dumber to borrow money from China to protect oil flow to China from middle-east.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Princess Goober. Bwahahahaha.


31 posted on 01/15/2015 9:49:06 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Enough with the gay presidents already! /s


32 posted on 01/15/2015 10:30:25 PM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No.

I am ready for the Transgender “Mrs” Graham.


33 posted on 01/15/2015 11:01:40 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure, it’s fun to cast aspersions on Graham’s masculinity. I’ve called him “Grahamnesty” for years. But I gotta tell you, I heard his comments on the US response to the Paris terror attacks, and he makes a LOT of sense. I would not want him as the nominee, but he maintains that he wants to bring a serious discussion of foreign policy and security issues to the upcoming campaign. I say let him/her/it.... (Is that “inclusive” enough?)


34 posted on 01/16/2015 4:16:27 AM PST by Wheelman81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

GTFOH! (Get the f*ck outta here!)


35 posted on 01/16/2015 4:32:01 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No. This is a waste of digital space, just as much as Grahqm is a waste of senatorial space. I’m SC, I didn’t vote for him.


36 posted on 01/16/2015 5:54:40 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ($$$$$ Don't Defund the Government...Defund Obama and his illegal policies $$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

You must feel all alone in SC where nearly all adore their Lindsey.


37 posted on 01/16/2015 5:57:35 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

LOL!

To even think Linda is acceptable presidential
material to Americans is proof that McCain’s brain has succumbed to its ravages


38 posted on 01/16/2015 5:58:45 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ben Carson has a better chance of being president than Lindsay Graham has. And Carson’s chances are somewhere between zilch and none.


39 posted on 01/16/2015 5:59:54 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

maybe the first white one

then again, maybe not


40 posted on 01/16/2015 6:00:03 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson