Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2015 5:27:39 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

“Big” is a relative term and I will say this: as long as I have to drive on the highways along with double trailer big eighteens whose drivers are high on speed and on tight time schedules, I am driving an SUV and not some tin can.


2 posted on 01/14/2015 5:37:17 AM PST by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Can you believe it? Americans are displaying the unmitigated gall to purchase vehicles that actually meet their transportation needs. Disgusting (/s)
SUV’s and their ilk are the modern substitute for the (by ME) missed STATION WAGON. The venerable wagon was the automobile that could fit all the kids, their carriages, sporting equipment and the stuff the parents had to carry with them. Try doing that in a lawn-mower engined “Fuel efficient” vehicle.
Also, my sorely missed wagon could take the entire load of stuff I needed down to “the boat” in a SINGLE trip. Friends with little cars with 1 cubic foot “trunks” took several trips to do the same thing. My “gas guzzler”, taking only a single trip, was much less of a gas “user”, accomplishing the task with a single trip.


3 posted on 01/14/2015 5:37:46 AM PST by CaptainAmiigaf (N.Y. TIMES: "We print the news as it fits our views.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Only the “elite” should drive safe cars.
The rest should drive “economy vehicles”, if we are allowed to drive at all.


4 posted on 01/14/2015 5:38:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

“...cheap gasoline sends consumers flocking to less-efficient pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles.”

Are people really this gullible? ‘Flocking?’

I LOVE my Ford Escape. I will never own anything smaller, again. I drove a Dodge Colt for 15 years. Great little car - but little. Now that I can SEE EVERYTHING I feel SO much safer and I can power out of situations - of run into, or over, others more safely, LOL!

FUCAFE!


7 posted on 01/14/2015 5:43:15 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I’m trying hard to envision a way of enforcing fuel efficiency standards that is more fundamentally stupid than CAFE, but I’m not having much luck.

I’m not sure who dreamed up the idea that forcing manufacturers to build what people don’t want to buy would improve efficiency, but it can’t have been anyone who had the slightest connection to the real world.


8 posted on 01/14/2015 5:43:44 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

How DARE the car manufacturers try to sell consumers vehicles that they want to buy? Don’t they understand that Obamanation is a central planned socialist economy?

Five and ten year plans have been written. The just need to follow them.


9 posted on 01/14/2015 5:44:08 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
I've read the constitution over and over an I have yet to discover any wording that covers how government has the power to regulate what we drive. I have also not found any mention that the government is empowered to tell our children what they can eat, or what the allowable size of our soft drinks is or any of the other "over reach that this administration and local government entities decree.

Get the Hell out of our lives and do your constitutionally legislated jobs!

10 posted on 01/14/2015 5:46:40 AM PST by rhubarbk (Did we lose the 2014 midterms . . . I'm really confused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Its time to get rid of “fuel economy standards.” They are a relic of the Jimmy Carter era and are no longer relevant.


11 posted on 01/14/2015 5:47:02 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

American automakers lose money on all the toy cars they are forced to sell, they have to make up the loss selling trucks/SUVs.


12 posted on 01/14/2015 5:49:20 AM PST by Beagle8U (NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
People need to realize that the rising CAFE standards in place were put in place to lower CO2 emissions from mobile sources(tailpipes). These standards also lower emissions of traditional pollutants from tailpipes.

Whereas EPA is heavily involved in reducing CO2 emissions from stationary sources such as power plants and cement kilns, they specifically declined to regulate tailpipes only because the rising CAFE standards would reduce CO2 emissions.

So, if the CAFE standards are relaxed, the enviros will be filing numerous lawsuits, and based on the 2007 SCOTUS decision, the enviros will likely win these lawsuits.

14 posted on 01/14/2015 5:52:07 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

If these CAFE standards prevail US highways will look like Cuban streets with fleets of aged trucks patched together and still running as replacements are not available.


22 posted on 01/14/2015 6:34:27 AM PST by The Great RJ (Pants up...Don't loot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

If people buy vehicles that guzzle more gallons of gas, that will mean the DC backstabbers won’t have any excuse to raise the gas tax, right?


28 posted on 01/14/2015 6:49:15 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Give me a Road Runner with a 440 six-pack!


34 posted on 01/14/2015 10:41:56 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Some years ago Reason Magazine had an article on the tradeoff between increased gas mileage via shrinking the size and mass of the car via the CAFE standards and the savings in petroleum.

As I recall, whatever fuel cost savings were obtained thru greater gas efficiency were offset by a factor of 5 from the increase in the costs due to the greater number of deaths and number and severity of injuries from accidents.

Everything has a cost, a principle so fundamental and simple that it’s beyond the comprehension of politicians.


37 posted on 01/14/2015 11:01:34 PM PST by KamperKen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Just a reminder, Hillary wanted the 55 MPH Speed Limit reinstated to protect the planet.


38 posted on 01/14/2015 11:11:26 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I love the way Politicians just make up numbers.

Gas Mileage (make it 1000 MPG), Minimum Wage (make it $1,000 an hour), The Stimulus Package (keep it under a Trillion), Obamacare (it will save you $2,500 a year), makes no difference.

They also take credit for the Engineering needed to achieve their lofty Goals. You know, so it is written, so it shall be done.

I guess they think that is Leadership. I call it Tyranny.


39 posted on 01/14/2015 11:22:14 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson