The American MSM would puzzle over the difference between a cocker spaniel and a border collie .....
I want the original cartoon !! I want to see it and laugh every day!!
No comments allowed at the NYTimes on this article.
While I was growing up, there was much todo about promoting “banned books” and otherwise opposing censorship (broadly defined).
Where the he11 did that go? or did the message get lost that “banned books” often are precisely because they ARE offensive and prone to eliciting violent response?
I think it does not matter a hill of beans whether they print or they do not print. The freedom to choose without being murdered is the point.
That french magh should put the NYTimes and other media in a bind by publishing a cartoon of muhammad holding a picture of “piss Christ”.
I wonder what they would pixelate?
US media = cowarsds and useful idiots
Idunno, the media sure act like they're owned by jihadis.Or by some other entities that have a stake in the jihad.
total cowards. sickening.
“Charlie Hedbo” normal run was 60,000.
Right after the massacre, they said their next issue would be ONE MILLION - WITH cartoons.
I heard today they are upping it to SIX MILLION - and have had thousands of new subscribers.
Everyone should get the edition, and tear pages out and plaster them EVERY where around the world - on lamp posts, in subways, in markets, on walls -
Solidarity - in your scum-bag faces, barbarians.
They would go apoplectic. Wouldn’t know which way to turn. They don’t know what to do when actually confronted...cowards, actually.
“...the heart of the debate about what constitutes free expression versus gratuitous images...”
There is no versus.
NYT is the rag that published the gratuitous and offensive Abu Grahab photos over and over.
NYT is lower than low and the worst they have ever been inntheir history and that is saying a lot.
The description of the cover contains a factual error.
There is no ‘prophet’ named Muhammad.
Fox News showed the new Charlie Hedbo cover for an extended time today.
Life is hard when you’re stupid and think you’re smart.
Does every news outlet have to publish every cartoon that offends people to the point of violence? I admire Hebdo and congratulate them on their courage, but they don’t carry a whip, either. The NY Times can publish the cartoon or not, as their editor and publisher sees fit, and let whoever wants guess about their motives.
