Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

The key here is the plan seems to have depended on a silent entry. They didn’t blast their way in, they needed to get in quietly and get upstairs to the editorial office.

If the lady had not put in the code, if they had started shooting on the street, it would have been a very different situation.

Yes, in all likelihood the lady and her child would have died at the door, still locked, the terrorists still on the street.

Israeli security guards commonly face a similar situation when they try to tackle a bomber before the bomber can get into a supermarket, for example.

ANYBODY who worked at a known terror target like Charlie Hebdo, especially those who knew the entry code, should have been better prepared for exactly this situation.


34 posted on 01/07/2015 11:58:32 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

Sounds like they had all the security the law allowed


36 posted on 01/07/2015 11:59:32 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

Yes, I agree, the people who know the code should have some kind of second level of verification that will not be visible outside.

Also, the police need to be armed. What exactly were they supposed to do? And how were the employees supposed to be protected by their presence in the face of armed invaders?


223 posted on 01/07/2015 1:33:51 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson