Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ATTACKING NAZIS BROADEN SAAR BASIN FRONT; PATTON MEETS STIFFER RESISTANCE IN BELGIUM (1/3/45)
Microfilm-New York Times archives, Monterey Public Library | 1/3/45 | Drew Middleton, Harold Callender, Harold Denny, Sydney Gruson, Hanson W. Baldwin, Arthur Krock

Posted on 01/03/2015 4:24:06 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Homer_J_Simpson

Lux Radio Theater: Shadow Of A Doubt (January 3, 1944)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbxiW7WvVXo


21 posted on 01/03/2015 5:42:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
Although General George Patton and some others on the American general staff prodded General Dwight Eisenhower to race to beat the Soviets to Berlin, Eisenhower correctly reasoned that to do so would gain the U.S. nothing politically and that, more significantly, an American assault on the city would mean the deaths of thousands of GIs.

Eisenhower correctly reasoned? Not in this case IMO. I think Patton was right. The cost of communist totalitarian slavery and oppression in East Germany was much higher than what would have been the cost to Americans to liberate all of Berlin.

Seems like Churchill and Patton were the clearest thinkers regarding the Communist menace.

22 posted on 01/03/2015 9:43:57 PM PST by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: occamrzr06
“Next to the weather,” Eisenhower would tell George Marshall, the French “have caused me more trouble in this war than any other single factor. They even rank above landing craft.”

he confided to De Gaulle in a low voice, “I am having a lot of trouble with Montgomery.”

The conference ended. “I think you’ve done the wise and proper thing,” Churchill told Eisenhower. Buttonholing De Gaulle in a corridor outside, the prime minister said, in his sibilant, fractured French, that Eisenhower was “not always aware of the political consequences of his decisions,” but was nonetheless “an excellent supreme commander.” De Gaulle said nothing

What a mess. It is amazing and a great tribute to Ike that he was able to keep this French/British mishmash together in some kind of cohesive effort. One can see reasons why without the Americans, the French and British were toast before the Nazi machine.

23 posted on 01/03/2015 9:57:51 PM PST by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew; henkster; colorado tanker; Homer_J_Simpson
PapaNew: "Eisenhower correctly reasoned?
Not in this case IMO.
I think Patton was right.
The cost of communist totalitarian slavery and oppression in East Germany was much higher than what would have been the cost to Americans to liberate all of Berlin."

Oh, my, that's a big can of worms you've opened, FRiend.
Let's see, we're talking about Yalta & Potsdam here...

If I remember correctly, President Roosevelt had already agreed with Churchill & Stalin that Soviet Russia would control most of Eastern Europe, including East Germany.
Peering inside FDR's mind, we find one thought, and one thought only, and that was to teach the Germans a lesson they would never, ever forget, and that, in his mind, meant splitting defeated Germany up amongst the conquerors.
Would the Soviets be tough on Germans?
Well, surely Germany deserved it, and would learn some humility from it....

So, I think Eisenhower already had his instructions from on-high.

And, if FDR had a second thought, it was certainly this: win the d*mn*ble war with as few American lives lost as possible.
So, if the Ruskies wanted to lose hundreds of thousands more lives killing Hitler in Berlin, why is that not a no-brainer?

Point is, I don't think FDR ever had the notion of Stalin as his future enemy.
As far as Roosevelt was concerned, whatever bargain was necessary to insure Stalin's unrestricted support, so be it.

Fortunately, Harry Truman had a somewhat different perspective, and in that sense, FDR's untimely death came none too soon.

24 posted on 01/04/2015 4:53:38 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; PapaNew; colorado tanker

And we still had a war to fight against Japan. Based on the experiences of Saipan and Leyte, we had every reason believe there was still much American blood to be shed before victory was secured. We needed to wrap up the was in Europe ASAP, and that meant letting the Soviets take Berlin.

There was also a timing/operational apsect. The timing of the Allied and Soviet offensives, along with the limits on each offensive imposed by logistic considerations, meant that the Soviets would get the last lunge at Berlin.


25 posted on 01/04/2015 11:27:03 AM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: henkster; BroJoeK; PapaNew
At that time the combat soldier usually stays with his unit unless he's hit. So, after defeating these German offensives and invading Germany, what they have to look forward to is going to the Pacific and fighting Japanese troops who they now know fight to the death.

Nobody has any idea about the Manhattan Project and all expect this war will drag well into 1946. How do I stay alive through all that?

Let lots of Russians die taking Hitler's bunker? Hell yeah.

26 posted on 01/04/2015 2:30:02 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson