Posted on 01/03/2015 3:49:17 AM PST by HomerBohn
With 2015 upon us, presidential candidates will begin the quadrennial ritual of crisscrossing the early primary states to make their electoral cases to voters. We aren’t going to pick favorites this early, before we even know who might enter the race, but it's a good moment to adumbrate principles that will guide us as we evaluate contenders.
First and foremost, we will look for a candidate with a demonstrated commitment to protecting and expanding freedom by limiting and reducing the burdens that Washington places on the ability of individuals to live their lives as they choose.
We hope the successful candidate will have a record of fighting to reduce the size and scope of government when it comes to taxes, spending, and regulation. He or she should support returning many decisions to state and local governments, which are more directly accountable to citizens.
Republicans often say they support such goals but don't show it once they've won office. For a good part of the George W. Bush presidency, Republicans controlled Congress as well as the White House. Yet, between 2001 and 2008, annual spending soared from $1.9 trillion to $3 trillion. After starting out with the idea of reforming America’s broken education system, Republicans augmented federal power with the ham-handed No Child Left Behind law.
Instead of reforming unsustainable programs, they added to our fiscal jeopardy by passing the largest expansion of entitlements since President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society with the Medicare prescription drug law. This is why we say attractive Republican candidates will have demonstrated their commitment to trimming government rather than just talking about it.
One of the defining failures of the Obama presidency has been an unwillingness to stand up for American values abroad. To his liberal admirers, Obama is a thoughtful leader who recognizes nuances in matters of state and can see things from multiple perspectives. In April 2009, a few months after taking office, he famously declared in Strasbourg, France, “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”
Obama presumably thought this a clever formulation. But if everyone is special, no one is really. And the president's dismal implication was that he didn't think there was anything objectively special about America. We hope the next president approaches global affairs with a better understanding of the nation's unique and beneficial role on the world stage, not with the distant cool of a relativist who treats all perspectives as equally valid.
The president should be an advocate for American interests and the principles on which it was founded. All candidates vying to succeed Obama should recognize this crucial role of the presidency. He or she will not weakly apologize for America but will project strength and repeatedly make the case for our rock solid ideals. Any worthy presidential candidate will also go beyond the ideals and beyond their opposition to Obama. They will offer voters a serious agenda.
Let us see policy prescriptions — and let the campaigning begin.
The next President should be completely normal and not be a four flushing parasite. He should have two main qualities: military experience, and business experience That would provide money and tax experience that would help to reduce or eliminate the massive debt that is destroying our country. I pray that the choices that we have for the future elections have those qualities and not just someone like Hillary, Warren, Bush or Romney: who likes to get in front of a camera.
Avoid anything the Democraps push and anything the RINOs push and we should be OK.
None of em had a clear NBC status, and that is NOT coincidence! It was planned so 0dunghill would have an excuse.
Thank you Dhimocrats and Rhinocrats.
HIll and Jeb, Jeb and Hill~ "What's the Difference?"
Since a “community organizer” from Kenya has worked out so well I’m thinking maybe we should be looking for a dog catcher from Uranus!
From the get go, it sounds like the authors are describing Cruz. Problem is, there are too many long term rinos that will block his nomination.
Since he did so well, why not his tranny wife?
There have been many candidates that both espoused and promised such. The problem is that they were lying through their clenched teeth with a smile on their lips.
Democrats simply will not tell you what they really want to do, and establishment Republicans may tell you what you want to hear but always have been eager to stab the American people in their backs on the way to their rationalization of why the have to do it.
To my mind, Cruz is the only candidate that would do what he says. And that is why MSM, Democrats and establishment Republicans hate him so.
A shoeshine boy from Chattanooga will work out just nicely as long as he has an eighth grade education.
Integrity, honor, moral compass,love of country, patriotism, intelligence, vision and everything else we dont have now.
And whoever the next Presidental Republican canidate is needs to have experience governing. No congress critters.
In the end, I do not care which politician is the candidate as long as they are Republican - our monster, our devil - as they all turn out to be. Else there will be a continuation of socialist rule and the socialist agenda to destroy the US.
Nit picking because someone does not match an individual’s criteria, and using those nits as an excuse not to vote, is to vote for continued socialist rule. There is no perfect candidate, not now, not ever.
There is absolutely no way that conservatism will win the day as long as erstwhile conservatives abstain from voting as they have in the past two Presidential elections. There is not a prayer that judgeships are given to conservatives by allowing a socialist to win the Presidency by default.
I thought they were describing Walker, someone who’s actually done it and with stiff Democrat opposition. He’s won three times in socialist heaven aka Wisconsin.
But what we get is a feminist Democrat. The Republicans will nominate a pleasant Statist who will then take a fall for the Election.
I’m not so sure there will be another president.
“What to look for in the next president”
No need to look beyond TED CRUZ!
What America needs is simple.
America needs a president who supports bringing back, American jobs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.