Posted on 12/30/2014 10:35:44 AM PST by ConservingFreedom
During my time at WDW, “gay days” was a license to act out and act up by the members of the “protected class”.
We went anywhere but the parks that week...
Welcome to The List.
ACTUALLY the ancient greeks has some very clear documented laws. Adults caught engaging in that conduct were stoned to death or exiled for life.
much of the misinterpretation comes from mistranslating.
(think star wars with the jedi master and the jedi student being intentionally misconstrued by hippies)
there is quite a bit of controversy around that opinion. mostly American and british “scholars” tend to push that view. particularly in the late 20th. It generally stems from a mistranslation of mentor/mentee teacher/pupil.
They knew they were making a scene and yet they went even further.
I worked with a homosexual woman who had the typical, arrogant, in your face, homosexual attitude.
She would refer to the other woman as her wife knowing she wasn’t really married in the state of FL . If that fact was pointed out with subtle hints to her she would reply “ I got married in NY and it’s legal now”.
At the work banquet she and her other homosexual turned up with fat flappy boobs hanging out and acting like a child with her.
Is it any wonder why most talk about her and not agree with her agenda, but of course one can’t say anything to her face as that would be a hate crime and she damn well knows she has that power over other people free speech.
There will always be people on here who have got lost and can’t understand this is not a pro homosexual left wing site.
There is a lot of what we call today, x-rated artwork and, I believe, a lot of documentation to support a homosexual/pederastic underpinning to ancient Greek society.
Again though, no such marital plans.
Let’s put it this way ... I’m a reformed bigot; “bigot” being “a person who holds blindly and intolerantly to a particular creed, opinion, etc.”
last time a us ivory tower elitist presented such arguments in Greece at a conference, disregarding any translation issues, he was thrown off stage and police were called to keep the other professors from causing him excessive harm from beatings.
it’s good to here you are a reformed bigot and that you can accept that this site and many do not agree with the homosexual agenda , nor them getting married and indoctrinating others to join their agenda.
Was just out in the store where the local newspapers here have this on the front page and there was not one person there who was in line reading this agreed about the homosexual sham marriage, infact many were appalled that these people could try to undermine the states will and constitution.
So much for their historical judgment then. Though history is what it has come to be.
Let them deny - as I earlier said - their ancient art and other documentation.
I suggest you look up “marriage” in your dictionary. My dictionary definition #4 says that “marriage” is “any close or intimate union” ...
I guess that your version of marriage which is anything which goes where as mine is one man and one woman .
Like I said though I am happy you are not a bigot no more and you admit that.
I guess you being on a conservative website wanting any kind of marriage or so called “intimate marriage” is giving you that different view you now can tolerate.
Not sure why you want other kinds of marriage other than one man and one woman , but I am thinking either one of your family members of a good friend is a homosexual and have talked you round to their view and you feel compelled to push your liberal view on here.
My dictionary defines "agenda" as ...program of things to be done; specif., a list of things to be dealth with at a meeting, etc.
Go figure.
Your guess is pathetically wrong.
Let me give you Webster's full definition of the word "bigot."
bigot ... "1. a person who holds blindly and intolerantly to a particular creed, opinion, etc." and "2. a narrow minded, prejudiced person."
Not sure why you keep quoting a dictionary the very fact you admitted you are not a bigot now is good, but alas I still can’t understand why you come on a conservative website pushing the homosexual agenda for marriage.
Do not advocate for the homosexual agenda on FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.