Posted on 12/27/2014 1:07:18 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
She is one of the most active — and most partisan — senators in the chamber, which is part of what makes Sen. Elizabeth Warren so attractive to the progressive groups pleading with her to enter the 2016 presidential race.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Fauxhontas could beat Hillary.
And she has yet to make a viable case for her candidacy.
which has the net side effect of creating the illusion that hillary is more centrist and thus properly triangulated toward the middle for the 2016 presidential election,
I agree she could, but she says flat out she won’t run.
Has Sen. Warren achieved any success in her first two years in office...other than energizing the wacky left wing radicals...who represent 1% of the U.S. population?
You mean Fauxhontas - sure she says she won’t run but if Hillary doesn’t look inevitable, look for that commitment to disappear.
Polka-heinie is further left and younger than shrillary. My fear is the jerks who elected zer0 will continue voting further and further left.
Unless we get a True Right candidate we will be stuck with one of these Marxist beyotches as the base will once again stay home
Neither does Hillary, whose term as Secretary Of State was singularly unimpressive.
Either one would be the final nail in the coffin of the United States of America.
The problem nowadays people seem to pick their candidates based on whether they agree with them or not, rather than on who would be the most capable of the job.
What has Fauxcahontas EVER done to show she is capable of being POTUS? And Hillary for that matter, or Obama for that matter?
She’s playing hard to get. She wants to have the nomination and election handed to her. She wants to play the act of “reluctant candidate” and “I’m doing this only because my country needs me.” And the left is desperate to have her run for two reasons:
1. They love her; she’s just what they really want in a president, and
2. They don’t love Hillary. No one does. She is more feared than loved, even by the left. And they know Hillary will be beaten. Too many negatives.
Make no mistake; Fauxahontas will be the democrat/communist candidate.
Oh, come on now! You really don’t think the Democrats would nominate someone who only has two year’s experience as a Senator, has no real accomplishments, and.....oh....wait a minute.....nevermind!
They may represent only 1% of the US population but they represent the majority of Dem primary voters.
When Warren ran for senator, she had a lot of hard-luck stories about her childhood that weren't 100% true. And Meemaw telling her she was an Indian, etc. She's probably getting better at campaigning and could do Clinton some damage, but she's not ready for the big time yet.
Liawatha is the ideal candidate. The moonbat left loves her, but she has no appeal to the rest of the country.
I heard her interviewed.
"Are you planning to run in 2016?"
"I have no plans to run."
"But in 2016. Will you be running in 2016?"
"I said I have no plans to run."
"Right now. But are you planning on running in 2016."
"I am not planning on running right now."
That's almost verbatim. And that represents her people skills.
Warren is being pushed not to rally liberals, but to drive people supposedly on the right to more liberal republicans who can ‘win’ against her. See the past 3 elections for proof of how stupid many on the right are to believe that works.
Well, it works for the left fine. Not so much for ‘us’.
No way is Hillary healthy enough to run she could vapor lock at any moment imho
when pressed on whether that was present tense only she pointedly refused to expand on the statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.