Posted on 12/26/2014 4:41:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The Supreme Court is poised for a blockbuster year in 2015and the list of high-profile cases could keep growing.
Already, the Court is set to rule in a case that threatens to wreak havoc on Obamacare. The justices are also considering questions of religious freedom, free speech, and limits on political fundraising.
That mix of cases poses big risks for liberals, who were caught off guard by the Court's enthusiasm for another high-stakes Obamacare battle. And under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court has steadily chipped away at campaign-finance limits.
But Republican governors and social conservatives also have a lot on the line: As soon as the justices return from their holiday break, they'll have to decide whether to take up same-sex marriage once againa step many legal observers believe the Court will simply have to take, and one that could clear the way for same-sex couples to legally marry in every state.
Here are the highest-profile issues the Court will likely tackle just in the first six months of 2015, before the current term ends around the end of June.
Obamacare
The justices will hear oral arguments March 4 in a lawsuit that threatens to cripple the health care law, just three years after Chief Justice John Roberts helped save it. This time, the challengers want the Court to invalidate the law's premium subsidies in states that didn't set up their own insurance exchanges. Most states didn't establish their own exchanges, and more than 80 percent of enrollees are getting subsidiesso a win for the challengers here would likely make insurance unaffordable for about 5 million people and could make insurance markets unstable in most of the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...
No, you understanding is fine. I believe that Roberts had to do mental gymnastics to arrive at his opinion to call the "fee"" a tax. Keep in mind, that Gruber was not party to the bill as a voting member of Congress and I doubt he was ever called to testify in the SC case. The other thing to note is that Congress could repeal Obamacare and override a presidential veto if there was the political will to do so. That is Robert's ultimate argument for not wanting to override Congress's intent.
I think good things are coming our way from this court!
Yeah and don’t forget that the (N)ew (W)orld (O)rder puppet Georgie thinks he and his daddy’s pals, the islamic scum murdering muzzie savages are “The Religion of Peace” also. Good God.
Fat chance in the "Roberts" Court!
That's mostly the point of a different lawsuit that's still out there.
If it were a tax, then all revenue raising bills must originate in the House. This bill did originate in the House as a minor insignificant bill (the "Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009") that was amended in the Senate to gut the old bill and replace it with Obamacare. The amended bill was sent back to the House for approval. There is another lawsuit out there to challenge Obamacare on the basis of the Origination Clause and the House's power of the purse.
Also, Obama said that Obamacare would lower people's health care costs. If this is a tax, it has the dual appearance of 1) raising people's health care costs, and 2) paying money as a tax for someone else's health care costs. A tax goes to the general welfare, not your own family's health care needs.
Calling it a tax undermines everything that Obama said about the Affordable Care Act.
-PJ
I needed a laugh to end the year with.
This court will never be able to undo the damages it has done to this country.
Most should share a jail cell with Holder and Obama.
Thanks.
Apparently, there is no end to the “enemies within”.
Comrade ayotolla 0bama has sufficient blackmail material on Roberts to ensure he does as he is told.
Roberts is too far in the Obama bag to back out now.
Just after the SC decision on Obamacare came out, someone wrote an article (Krauthammer or George Will? I am working from a somewhat sketchy memory), where they made the point about the tax thing and said that Roberts did the right thing in pointing out that it was a tax - as if the Court was saying: "This thing needs to be corrected before we handle this again." But, it seems a lot of people prefer using the Supreme Court as the end point for the work Congress should be doing, when the Supreme Court is supposed to just decide whether something is constitutional or not.
So, if it is a tax and Congress did not figure it as such then someone has dropped the ball.
The media has been quite silent on this matter. Almost like the vase has dropped and broke on the floor - and the media is hushing everything to make sure no one notices that the vase just broke.
They will do anything to protect Obama won't they? Even if it greatly impinges on us Americans.
They’ll just blackmail Roberts again.
I have always feared the Supreme Court. Now that it’s packed with leftists, I fear them even more.
Put not your trust in horses from Egypt...
Both Bushes turned out to be a joke on America. Ready for round three?
In women’s tennis, always bet against the heterosexual . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.