I agree is was that low in the 1990s as well. But your statement was the last time.
No questions it was below $30 for most of decades before that.
And look at the link in post 23 for your answer. Does that disagree with “every report you’ve found”?
Nope. It gives no basis to the claim $20 for a decade. No support at all for the numbers you made up.
You don’t know much do you?
Didn't take you long to go back to personal attacks did it? Can we stay with the topic instead?
Now read the above link and tell your thoughts here.
Why don't you cite the words in the article that you think support the claim of $20 for a decade. I find nothing in there. It doesn't even mention a price of oil or a time period for a dip in the article.
And look at the link in post 23 for your answer. Does that disagree with “every report you’ve found”?
> “Nope. It gives no basis to the claim $20 for a decade. No support at all for the numbers you made up.”
The link shows clearly that the Saudis are afraid of US Oil Production which demolishes the garbage article you posted.
As far as the number “20”, you’re splitting hairs trying to make a frivolous point. The number could be 30, 25, 20, 19, 23, 31 etc. But of course your schtik is to divert attention to frivolous matters when you’ve called on the carpet about much bigger matters.
Now read it again and compare it with your Rippelmeyer garbage:
Why do you spar with an unarmed opponent? I realize there is gratification in teaching the ignorant an enlightening them but you gotta have some raw material to work with.
This guy would argue with a fence post over which side of it the sun would come up. To learn anything you have to at least suspect you need to.