Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gas industry: Drilling tax could cripple Pa. economy
Inquirer Harrisburg Bureau ^ | December 17, 2014 | Amy Worden

Posted on 12/17/2014 7:50:18 AM PST by thackney

Three days after the newly elected Senate majority leader opened the door to negotiations on a natural gas drilling tax, industry leaders reiterated their stand that such a tax would harm the state's economy.

Additional taxes would have a "crippling effect on jobs" said Stephanie Wissman, executive director of the Associated Petroleum Industries of Pennsylvania.

"It threatens to stifle energy production and the jobs that go with it," Wissman said in a conference call with reporters Tuesday.

The prospect of a severance tax on gas production in the lucrative Marcellus Shale - an issue dormant since Gov. Ed Rendell left office in 2011 - reemerged this year when gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf campaigned on a platform to use the tax to pump as much as $1 billion into public schools.

Wolf, who takes office next month, has vowed to move forward with a 5 percent tax on extracted gas. That would replace the current "impact fee" assessed on each well - which has generated $630 million, mostly for the towns and counties where drilling occurs - even as GOP leaders who control both chambers in the General Assembly have resisted additional taxes.

With an anticipated $2.2 billion deficit looming next year...

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: energy; fracking; naturalgas; paping; pataxes; pennsylvania; tomwolf
When the oil/gas drilling companies are trying to decide which areas they can afford to keep pursuing, and which areas to save for later, they mistakenly believe choking the golden goose will produce more eggs.
1 posted on 12/17/2014 7:50:19 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
Somebody in gummint oughta look up the word "tax" some day in the dictionary.

They might be surprised it means things like, "choke", "throttle", "restrict", "burden", etc.

Only in Obonics does the word "tax" mean anything positive.

2 posted on 12/17/2014 7:54:24 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Meanwhile, the United States continues to strangle itself with the world’s worst business taxation.....with zero regard for the consequences of same...


3 posted on 12/17/2014 7:55:11 AM PST by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
What's driving this is envy.

The people that aren't directly making money from the gas boom feel they are being cheated, and they want their's damn it.

So what if it kills future drilling.

4 posted on 12/17/2014 7:56:25 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
But Wolfie promised to give the schools all the money ObaMao gave them during Porkulus and he won!

I noticed our local high school still manages to pay a football coach an two assistants benefits and salary packages of over $100K each for a 3-10 record, but "saved money" by eliminating a popular foreign language program run by a teacher who earns less than $50K, but she kept her job because she teaches another less popular foreign language program which they kept. I wonder what they saved. The money spent for textbooks?

5 posted on 12/17/2014 8:00:27 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

uhhhh...the drillers are under economic threat from lower prices. Wouldn’t raising that tax force more people who now have jobs that pay well on to the unemployment lines, thus worsening Pennsylvania’s economy?


6 posted on 12/17/2014 8:01:08 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Three days after the newly elected Senate majority leader opened the door to negotiations on a natural gas drilling tax...

So is it really a "drilling tax"? Like...assessed on a per foot basis, perhaps? Or is it really just a common, everyday severance tax on production at the wellhead, which many states already have?

And is the author of the article really a drooling simpleton for referring to a severance tax as a "natural gas drilling tax?"
7 posted on 12/17/2014 8:01:17 AM PST by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
That would replace the current "impact fee" assessed on each well - which has generated $630 million, mostly for the towns and counties where drilling occurs . . .

IOW, the hogs who would benefit most would be the densely populated places like Philadelphia which has the most greedy schools and where no drilling happens. The places which would suffer would be cities like Washington, PA or Punxsutawney who actually need the impact fees to build and repair roads, schools and other infrastructure needed to support the growth produced by drilling.

8 posted on 12/17/2014 8:04:54 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Milton Miteybad

Reading past the headline:

The prospect of a severance tax on gas production in the lucrative Marcellus Shale - an issue dormant since Gov. Ed Rendell left office in 2011 - reemerged this year when gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf campaigned on a platform to use the tax to pump as much as $1 billion into public schools.


9 posted on 12/17/2014 8:14:02 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Well, I live in a drilling area and my attorney told me that these additional taxes will come out of my royalties.

Royalties which are already taxed as income, but apparently that's not enough.

The people that live in the cities think the gas companies are stealing from them and getting away w/ it.

Meanwhile, Washington County is booming because of gas, but its too much to expect that the morons that live in Washington, the city, will understand that this tax will take $$ from us and send it to Philly and Pittsburgh and, most emphatically Harrisburg.

10 posted on 12/17/2014 8:14:40 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I think they should tax & tax some more all blue states until the bleed red.


11 posted on 12/17/2014 8:15:48 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milton Miteybad
Reading past the headline intro:

Sorry.

Deeper in the article, past the excerpt I was allowed:

With an anticipated $2.2 billion deficit looming next year, Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman (R., Centre) on Saturday said he was willing to discuss a severance tax if Wolf would negotiate on cutting costs in the state pension system.

12 posted on 12/17/2014 8:16:47 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

Yes.

Most gas producing states levy a severance tax on its gas production, and those who don’t currently are thinking hard about it. Gas severance taxes are based on either the volume or value of the gas production. Royalty owners pay their pro rata share of these gas severance taxes. You’ll notice this tax burden as a deduction on your monthly royalty revenue statements.

http://www.mineralweb.com/owners-guide/leased-and-producing/royalty-taxes/gas-severance-tax/


13 posted on 12/17/2014 8:18:09 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Milton Miteybad
..which many states already have? Yes, its an extraction tax, which many states already have.

But what most states don't have is the existing burdensome taxes PA has;corp tax, income tax, sales tax, usage fees out the @ss, at some of the highest rates in the country.

PA is ranked 46th in business climate, w/ this tax we can make it all the way to 50th.

14 posted on 12/17/2014 8:21:19 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

How ‘bout let’s tax oil that comes from OPEC and eliminate taxes on domestic oil.


15 posted on 12/17/2014 8:25:07 AM PST by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: privatedrive
Tax OPEC

Spot on.

16 posted on 12/17/2014 8:43:43 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Legislators with new taxes are like monkeys on a new banana tree...


17 posted on 12/17/2014 9:24:42 AM PST by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
IOW, the hogs who would benefit most would be the densely populated places like Philadelphia which has the most greedy schools and where no drilling happens. The places which would suffer would be cities like Washington, PA or Punxsutawney who actually need the impact fees to build and repair roads, schools and other infrastructure needed to support the growth produced by drilling.

Bingo. As it stands now, the Philadelphia mob can't get their sticky fingers on the money from drilling in the Western and Central parts of the state. The tax money now stays where the drilling takes place. The Philly mob does not like that.

18 posted on 12/17/2014 10:00:47 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Yeah...I saw all that. It's clearly supposed to be a severance tax, which is a tax assessed on production at the wellhead. Hence the question arises...why would the author call what is obviously a severance tax a "drilling tax?"

Just seems like an absurdly ignorant/stupid way to describe a a fairly common type of tax that really has little to do with "drilling," per se, and far more with the actual production that occurs after the conclusion of the drilling phase.
19 posted on 12/17/2014 10:58:12 AM PST by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson