[wagglebee]

It's pretty obvious to me that regardless how many times he passionately calls for protecting the life of the unborn in interview after interview you will still have your doubts. You have pre-conceived notions that you will believe regardless of the facts.

The FACTS that I have presented are the actual words of the Pauls.

No. "Life of the mother" means exactly what it says. Usually "health of the mother" is used as the slippery slope to open the door to unfettered abortions. He didn't mention that. You are intentionally confusing things.

He said, "where the life of the mother is involved and other things that are involved." "And other things" means those reason in addition too the life of the mother.

There is no Constitutional basis for outlawing a procedure.

Have you actually read the Constitution or is this some libertarian talking point? Amendments 4, 5 and 13 CLEARLY outlaw procedures.

If not through legislation as Dr. Paul suggests, how do you think we should establish who is and who is not a human?

The legislation he suggests DOES NOT ESTABLISH PERSONHOOD, it lists ideals and concludes with "and then you can kill the baby."

[nitzy]

There is no Constitutional basis for outlawing a procedure.

Have you actually read the Constitution or is this some libertarian talking point? Amendments 4, 5 and 13 CLEARLY outlaw procedures

..and how exactly do these amendments outlaw THIS procedure?

You have kind of proved my point. We either need an amendment such as 4,5 or 13 to outlaw this particular procedure. Or we can simply pass a law clarifying that 14 covers human being in the womb.