Julian Assange Unleashed: Hillary Clinton Is A Threat, Google Is A Monopoly And Should Be Broken Up

Forbes ^ | 12/15/2014 | Augustino Fontevecchia

[John S Mosby]

"Always controversial, Julian Assange gave an interview in London, where he’s exiled in the Ecuadorian embassy, where he lambasted Hillary Clinton, who he called a “threat” to the resolution of his issues. Beyond delving on Hillary’s relationship with Google, Assange also said the search giant should be broken up by regulators due to its dominant position. Assange also spoke of a secret trove of Bank of America BAC +0.5% data he threatened to release three years ago, and of course touched on the situations of Edward Snowden, who’s pursuit by the U.S. government was larger than Osama Bin Laden’s, and (Bradley/Chelsea)Manning."

[John S Mosby]

Pictured with Chomsky, Assange points out valid things that are manipulating for Hillary. Him not saying how great Eliz. Warren would be. The observations of google's lobbying power explains a lot of what just happened in congress. They are nearly ALL bought dogs who lap whatever electro money they can get to line their pockets. Hear Hear to Levin! Take it to them, and then... take it away. It has to be stopped.

[Jeff Chandler]

Assange points out valid things that are manipulating for Hillary. Him not saying how great Eliz. Warren would be.

I have read so many statements like this on FreeRepublic this morning I wonder if I am having a stroke!

.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Sharpton sure is adept at butchering the english language : )

Ice tea & Skillets was his crime.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

I actually tend to agree with him about Google, and large media companies in general. Too much potential to control the flow of information that is necessary to a free and open society.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

[GOPJ]

Have you seen this Hillary story??

http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/why-hillary-is-not-inevitable-bills-sordid-past/

from link:

The new public scrutiny of Bill Cosby is also problematic for Bill Clinton. I am not talking about consensual sex but, in some cases accusations of sexual assault, torn clothing, and at least three victims who say he bit their lips as a disarming move and to get them to remain silent. In short, Bill Clinton has a Bill Cosby problem.

Eileen Wellstone, a 19-year-old English woman, said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where Clinton was a student in 1969. In fact, Clinton was expelled from Oxford and earned no degree there.

Juanita Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape. Broaddrick gave a stunning interview to NBC’s Lisa Myers about the assault.

Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met Gov. Clinton at a political fundraiser and was invited to his hotel room. “When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn’t even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room,” she said.

[Liz]

Comparing notes?

[John S Mosby]

If you mean bad lingo— sorry about that. This is just observational. Not that Assange cannot be “assessed” so to speak. Look who the hell is standing next to him Noam Chomsky commie lib extraordinaire. So if Assange isn’t an operative, what is he.

Don’t let your head explode. It’s an interNUT morning. Yow!
And gooooggglee is in the middle of it, manipulating. Useful to consider the various “sources” mostly made up. Rush is on this topic today. Fake news, fake stories, fake “journalism” riding dirty on....the Truth. You know like RT and Pravda! LOL.

[John S Mosby]

Took whoever it is in the “media” to get the actual story— on ole Billy boy. It’s what they do— cover for rapists as long as it’s their rapist.

How long did it take to find out FDR (him with no leg control) was boinking his “aide” in Warmed up Springs. Years.
And then you look at Eleanor and think—”well, can understand that pretty much”. Oh, and the truth about old Eleanor and her “gal pal” carpet munchers, and Josh White and the blacks and the whole shooting match. It’s what happens after 4 terms.
But.... they were “nice” people LOL.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

John S Mosby: "..Assange points out valid things that are manipulating for Hillary."
" The observations of google's lobbying power explains a lot of what just happened in congress."

#1 Hillary: Ever wonder why it is so difficult to find negative references to Hillary on G666GLE search engine?
Ever wonder why there are so many "victims" comming out to complain about Bill Cosby's past sexual activities, while not mentioning "Slick Wille's" conquests ?
And notice which media outlets keep chasing storys about Cosby, and see who they are pollitically leaning towards.
As long as sexual assaults remain front page, there is an implied undercurrent impacting on Hillary's electability... "Wag the Dog".

#2 We just witnessed the power of big money of G666GLE, Facebite, and other electronic social media with the passing of illegal alien amnesty.
Forget the fact that for years G666GLE was flying corporate and private planes on lower cost FED Govt. fuel, or were housed on FED Govt. property. Only recently changed .
Forget the fact that G666Gle is expanding and renting on a military base that has just been convienently declared 'surplus' and made avaiable to them,for research into robots.
What G666Gle is to 'intellectual search' , is what NSA is to citizen privacy.
G666GLE is too large, and knows too much , and so doesn't also the NSA !
Can you imagine if you combined G666Gle knowledge, NSA privacy , and Executive political action into one large corporation ? I think we are already there !
Whatever happened to : "Do No Evil"

[marron]

Google was directly involved in the overthrow of Mubarak in Egypt. Which is weird if you think about it.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

I actually tend to agree with him about Google, and large media companies in general. Too much potential to control the flow of information that is necessary to a free and open society.

Whatever you say about Google WRT that goes tenfold for the “conspiracy against the public” (Adam Smith’s description) known as the Associated Press. Of course Adam Smith, writing in 1776, had no experience of the AP, formed 3/4 of a century later. But

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary. - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations

could hardly be a more prescient warning about the “virtual meeting” of all major journalists which is the AP newswire. A meeting not “for merriment or diversion,” but exactly about the business of journalism, and which does not end with "a conspiracy against the public" only because it does not end.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Good point. I think A.P. is an abomination. They should’ve had their not-for-profit status stripped years ago

[bert]

Then there is Comcast. It must not be broken up, comcast must be destroyed