Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

OK....I’m a major gun enthusiast...but I’ve also gotten too old and too tired to keep up with these things. I thought all gun transfers (except father to son) required a background check as a result of Federal laws.

In simple English....what did this new law change, please?


4 posted on 12/15/2014 10:50:07 AM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JoeDetweiler

You can’t even let a friend hold your gun ... it’s considered a transfer under the initiative and therefore a background check must be made.


11 posted on 12/15/2014 10:53:36 AM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler
I thought all gun transfers (except father to son) required a background check as a result of Federal laws.

Not true.

16 posted on 12/15/2014 10:58:09 AM PST by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

Private transfers and most gun show transfers did not require a background check prior to this new law in WA State. However, private transfers are continuing off the radar pretty much as always.


19 posted on 12/15/2014 10:59:29 AM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler
I thought all gun transfers (except father to son) required a background check as a result of Federal laws.

This is what I was told by a lawyer: Vertical transfers (father to son, daughter to grandma, etc.) are allowed. But horizontal transfers (son to nephew, etc.) are not.

It says a lot about federal law that there is so much murkiness here.

31 posted on 12/15/2014 11:12:50 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

Per Federal Law: any interstate transfer (with few exceptions) must go through a FFL. Any sale by an FFL must be accompanied by a 4477. Private sales/transfers are not regulated by Federal law.

The Washington law was intrastate and was over and above the Federal statute, further regulating the transfer of firearms within the state.


37 posted on 12/15/2014 11:17:22 AM PST by Herzo61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

No, the transfer of firearms between private citizens DOES NOT and NEVER HAS required a background check.


41 posted on 12/15/2014 11:23:54 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

“Transfers” must now go through a Federally Licensed Dealer, and background check performed.

So, if I hand my gun to a friend in the woods, we’re both felons.


52 posted on 12/15/2014 11:47:31 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Boner and McTurtle funded Amnesty and 0bamaCare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

The Feds only require a background check on guns bought at retail gun shops and inside gun shows in some states. Private sales between individuals no.


62 posted on 12/15/2014 12:17:22 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson