Posted on 12/09/2014 7:17:40 AM PST by wagglebee
I know!
And now we have 4 more years of Mr. Sociopath in charge because of it. I’m not in any way condoning Romney or any of his stances, I can’t stand the guy to be honest. But a vote for him would’ve better served us CONSERVATIVES than a non-vote. Politics isn’t Religion, sometimes you have to choose the lesser of the evils.
I assume (or am I going to be an A$$) that you’re conservative since you’re on this site right?
I have no dog in this fight really—all I said was Romney would’ve been better than Obama, then you and your click got all riled up.
Uh-huh...so what do you suggest since we’re all CONSERVATIVES? Or did FR change overnight to something else?
Oh lord....
Fine! Vote your 3rd parties or stay at home when the next RINO elitist gets selected (you know it’s gonna happen)...and remain bitter LOSERS! Give this country completely over to evil, because that’s exactly what’s happening.
Thank you ;)
I’m not the one who added 8 people when posting a response.
Why would a Christian support a liberal, pro-abortion candidate like Romney anyways
LOL! You too!
Over Obama I did.
By and large, colleges formed by Christian organizations of various stripes have gone at best to the liberal side of their religion, or more commonly, entirely abandoned any Christian underpinnings. Until the university system collapses due to financial failure or outside competition through remote, on-line learning, the secular humanist grip on the ivory tower will remain.
Why is this important? In the 1980s and 1990s, the Christian Right, led by Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, et. al., won significant victories electorally. However, none of the victories were long lived because of the electoral cycle replacing conservatives with liberals (e.g. the 2006 and 2008 elections, the most recent liberal high tide) and the death or retirement of the principal leaders. Of the men listed above, only Robertson tried to groom an heir (Ralph Reed), but he didn't pan out.
Romney had no chance to win over enough Democrats, he should have just ran against Obama in the Democrat primary.
Until the hidden oligarchs who choose the candidates for both parties are eliminated from the process, this evil of no actual choice but evil’s worker will continue. That elimination will not happen because those same oligarchs are reaching for the reset button, to bring down the Republic before We The People awaken to our reality. The euphemistically named Federal Reserve was the beginning of the end ...
The author makes the mistake of thinking the majority of U.S. voters are real Christians. What is the end result of the votes of 200 million sinners?
You think a conservative should pull the lever for a pro-abortion, pro-homo agenda, pro-gov-health care, pro-amnesty leftist [question mark]
I don’t. I would never vote for that candidate in a million years.
He was a far worse candidate than was McCain and Dole, none of these squishes had a chance. McCain got a huge boost when he picked Sarah for Veep and then his own campaign started attacking her behind the scenes and then he all but endorsed Obama a week or so BEFORE the election.
The GOP is never going to win the White House again until it nominates a real conservative for President.
I would suggest that withholding one’s vote from an unacceptable candidate is a valid tactic - no matter who starts yelping about it.
I do find it interesting that you appear to claim the mantle of conservatism by reason of your 10 month tenure at Free Republic, despite your expressed opinions (at least on this thread).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.